• GladiusB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m asking how it’s going to react with stuff. In like a basic chemistry kind of way.

    • PapaStevesy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Seems like something a hazmat DOT fleet manager would already know though, so I guess I just don’t know why you’re asking that. And truthfully, I don’t particularly care, as, again, I fail to see the relevance. I mean like, if it’s real chemical kinetic information that you’re after, there are innumerable better sources than the comments section of a meme page on a fringe social media platform. If you’re trying to make a point about my original tongue-in-cheek comparison, feel free to make it.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ok. You can just accept you’re wrong rather than double downing and sounding less educated than you originally did.

        • PapaStevesy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Mmm yes, because “double downing” is a phrase an educated person uses. Got it, lolol.

          Look, I would totally accept that I was wrong if I knew what you were referring to, but I literally don’t know, you haven’t explained your opinion at all. Like, please! Tell me what you mean! What am I wrong about?

          • GladiusB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Like totally. Because educated people don’t know modern lingo or anything. No cap. Your argument is so mid.

            • PapaStevesy@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              At least I gave one, even if it was sarcastic. Once again, all you offer is non sequiturs and haughty derision. I guess I just want to know what you think this discussion is about, because all I’ve gotten out of it is vacuous meta-argument trollery.

              • GladiusB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Blah blah blah. You can’t accept that you don’t have a single point and just keep yammering on. I’m not even reading your response.

                • PapaStevesy@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Lololol it started with my single point and then you changed the subject so you could…flex your in-depth chemistry knowledge on me I guess? But without actually making any salient point, so I’m left, as you say, yammering on to what is essentially a brick wall.

                  • GladiusB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    No. Oxygen doesn’t react to itself in a sealed vessel. But I guess you aren’t smart enough to put those duplos together on your own. So good luck.