• Gladaed@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, it would not. There already are waterways splitting North America into multiple large pieces.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nope, the continental plate would not be separated by a river flowing over top.

      • onion@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Continents are not defined by tectonic plates, for example Eurasia is separated by an imaginary line. There is no universally agreed upon definition of what exactly earths continents are either.

      • kylie_kraft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        we’re already on the edge of civil war over clumps of undifferentiated cells and pronouns. absolutely yes

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, but not for slavery this time, but for fresh water in the decades ahead of climate change. Those freshwater Great Lakes will be awfully attractive 100 years from now.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        We’d have to change all the names!

        Canada’s pants become Canada shorts and Canada socks