• NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Is it unfathomable that someone could see something they think is wrong but doesn’t think starting a long-winded Internet argument wherein neither party will in any scenario whatsoever convince the other of anything is worth their time?

      • subversive_dev@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I think it’s representative of intellectual cowardice which is why I made my comment. It is entirely consistent with my experience when commenting on a .world post and calling out Liberalism’s “true face”.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I take drive by downvotes as a compliment, the meaning I get from them is, “I don’t like this because it challenged my beliefs in a way I can’t answer.” Great! That’s what I was going for.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      if you say “libs” it instantly puts people in the headspace of “own the libs”, “everything i don’t like is woke”… it’s a dog whistle, and thus sets people up to think the rest of what’s being said is tainted

      the ideologies in the group are not a cohesive block

      • subversive_dev@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Part of the reason to use the word is to expose liberals to the idea that they are not in fact the Left and their policies support capitalism at every turn