There’s another post in another sub. In case you want to discuss whether it is good or bad please do it over there. I’d like to keep this about how to do it, not about opinions. https://lemmy.ml/post/16939802
There’s another post in another sub. In case you want to discuss whether it is good or bad please do it over there. I’d like to keep this about how to do it, not about opinions. https://lemmy.ml/post/16939802
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36669053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9860667/ at least cite papers that aren’t related to a church
Why don’t you explain where the conflict of interest is?
Someone who promotes the idea that a con artist who lived 2000 years ago is god’s son isn’t a reliable source.
Right, so no actual objection, very good then. You’d have done better to stick to citing the sources you provided instead of trying to dismiss mine for such a weak reason, as those papers might at least be halfway convincing that there’s more study needed - after looking through the authors and funding to confirm there’s no conflict of interest of course, like say if a paper got funded by a dog food company that sells vegan products.