• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Once the hive mind takes over and the downvote train starts it’s all but impossible to turn your post positive regardless of contrition. It’s unfortunate because it removes some incentive to publicly self-correct.

    • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is why so many people edit their comments that are wrong and get corrected by someone else to say EDIT: CORRECTED BELOW or something, to prevent mindless downvotes from lazy people not reading the full chain of comments. Personally I think it’s worse like that but I can see why they do it if they care about karma.

      • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I prefer people do that than either delete the comment, or edit the original. Otherwise the comment chain makes no sense, and people don’t get a chance to learn from the original incorrect comment.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The public voting system is massively flawed when it comes to websites and sharing content. Since anyone who really wants visibility can just pay any number of services to boost their posts and comments, you have no idea what’s real and you have no idea what the general public actually supports.

      For the average person who doesn’t think about what’s going on behind the scenes, it looks like an accurate representation of society’s interests and leanings. This is probably why we have a sharp uptick of far-right assholes and why so many young guys are turning towards sexist, racist figures online. The very same people who also proudly talk about how good they are at manipulating people. Hmmn.

  • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Transcendence is not giving a fuck and being confidently wrong.

    Honestly though, part of it. Internet weirdos gonna internet weirdo. Source : am internet weirdo

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Transcendence is not giving a fuck and being confidently wrong.

      sometimes i like to just, say the wrong opinion, for no reason other than i think it’s funny. But also educational to watch how people react to things.

    • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I stay away from what all I call bummer topics because mentally, I just can’t take it anymore. I’m 38, and im already done with this life and the constant bullshit that the people in power do. So I just look at cute animals, video games, macro photography stuff, and stuff like that.

  • Whirlygirl9@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If I remember the ancient days correctly, you were supposed to downvote incorrect info so it wouldn’t appear at the top? You weren’t supposed to downvote if you disagreed but if it was wrong info? Am I hallucinating that?

    • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You were supposed to upvote the best version of each argument/position or additional info and downvote the rest. Instead the site is the most popular opinion presented 6 different ways.

    • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Those were still the rules when I left last year. People will upvote misinformation in the face of proof on there and here on lemmy.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        If a platform puts arrow buttons on everything people say, and tell you that up means you get “points”, it’s a social metric. At this point if you’re trying to create a consensus metric, you’ll have to think of something else. It’s too ingrained in us.

        • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Lemmy has no total score anymore, so the up and down votes only matter in the topic layer. I think that’s the best solution rn. There’s no big incentive any longer to point farm.

            • maniii@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Also even when some are trolling, the up/down vote will not gain/lose attention for the troll. Trolls love attention.

              The lack of karma means participation is there not whether it is a troll or regular.

              Unless it is spam, almost no one is punished/rewarded for participating.

            • Marand@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              On Lemmy there is disincentive to troll right? If you’re being too much of a troll you might get thrown out of your instance for making it look bad. Unless you selfhost of course. I’m not sure why botspam from selfhosted lemmy’s is not a bigger problem to be honest. You can deferate them but it’s easy to make new ones.

        • Codex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          This kind of information is all suppressed now, but early on when Facebook only had likes, there was a lot of discussion on how downvotes weren’t really needed. It was believed that people engaged more with content they enjoyed, and ignored unfavorable content.

          This is wildly wrong. People obsessively engage with content they hate, to the extent that it probably makes more sense to only have a down vote button. Everyone knows that now, and the big sites uses psychological studies funded by casinos to gamify engagement, entirely in the pursuit of click-pennies.

          What do votes mean? On lemmy it seems nothing. On other sites they mean revenue for the owners.

          • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Except youtube, because dislikes were only used to call out scams and ads. The ad people got mad and now misinformation is easier to spread.

          • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I have never cared for human nature. It’s tedious at best and often ghastly. We should all concern ourselves much more with human nurture.

            To put it plainly, we should not be letting corporations do research on how to manipulate our most base instincts on social media. That would have been a moderate solution a century ago. Now we would need a more radical approach, such as outlawing most forms of advertising content and social media manipulation. And even raising the topic probably makes me sound insane.

    • ESC@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I believe you were “supposed” to upvote/downvote by whether the comment contributes to the discussion and community.

  • pelletbucket@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I finally managed to cop a permanent ban. I’ve been running around telling every dick head moderator what I think of them for the last year

  • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I hated downvotes on Reddit because like merely 5 would silence all anti honeymoon’s sentiment. This place, your can have a million downvotes but the comment is still there so i just count em as engagement points. Someone felt strongly, that means i wrote something worth reading in a way

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This is clearly fake. If it had really happened at least one person would have called them a slur and downvoted their entire post history, then they would have been permabanned from 7 different subreddits.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      i had the experience of someone recently threatening to kill me or something if i was doxxed, i then promptly told them to go doxx me.

      I was very disappointed to learn that they didn’t doxx me.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re missing pulling something out of their comment history without any context.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Now-now it’s Reddit - he might have posted on one of the subs that people monitor with bots and silently autoban you from other subs for having ever participated in the offending sub. So he might very well have been Perma banned from 7 other subs for the comment, whether it was up voted, downvoted or totally ignored.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    yeah thats most of the internet for you.

    Unless you’re shitposting, or actually on a good topic, it’s an absolute clusterfuck of a place.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you are attached to whether you’re attracting downvotes or upvotes you are setting yourself for disappointment for no reason. Just say your thing.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I agree 100%. It just sucks when I go out of my way to post a thoughtfully-worded comment so I can positively contribute to Lemmy, only to have someone nitpick my comment and reply with an “Um, aktshually” and a downvote. The downvote brigading on Lemmy seems even more punitive than it was on Reddit; of course this varies largely depending on the post’s subject matter and instance.