• andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    True. Sorry should have specified in the US they can just say we are letting you go and you’re done. Which as far as I’m concerned is basically a catch all statement of “we aren’t going to tell you why, we are just firing you”.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I worked for a company that trained me that “right to work” meant I could fire someone and tell them it was because I didn’t like the color of their shoes. I suppose that’s an excuse or reason but at that point is there really any difference?

        • Pandantic@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Right to work means they can’t be required to join a union. They / you are thinking of “at will employment”. You may get this confused because some states pass them together.