J.K. Rowling is embroiled in a fresh row with another Harry Potter actor over transgender rights.
Following exchanges of fire with Daniel Radcliffe and others, Rowling has blasted David Tennant after the Goblet of Fire star voiced strident views on those who speak out against trans rights.
During an appearance at the British LGBT Awards over the weekend, he called on British equalities minister Kemi Badenoch to “shut up” after she advocated for banning trans women from entering women’s toilets and sports teams.
In an interview at the same event, Tennant called transgender critics “a tiny bunch of little whinging f*ckers who are on the wrong side of history, and they’ll all go away soon.”
Earlier in the week, Rowling branded people like Tennant the “gender Taliban.” In posts on X (once Twitter) on Friday, she expanded her comments to address Tennant’s “wrong side of history” quote.
Rowling wrote: “This man is talking about rape survivors who want female-only care, the nurses currently suing their health trust for making them change in front of a man, girls and women losing sporting opportunities to males and female prisoners incarcerated with convicted sex offenders.”
She added: “For a man who’s supposedly a model of compassion and tolerance, he sure does want a lot of people to cease to exist.”
Does anyone understand what group of people she’s even refering to here? Women who have gone through sexual assault? Is changing in front of a trans woman=not existing? Genuinely confused
I interpreted it to mean that Tennant wants female sexual assault survivors who have issues being treated by males (and all the other kinds of people Rowling mentioned) to cease to exist so that Tennant doesn’t have to account for their needs.
Bobby Brewster was better than Harry Potter. Change my mind!
I can’t as Bobby Brewster and the Winkers’ Club is clearly the superior title.
I think she believes that if we respect trans women, women cease to exist.
right…