• mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Who, apart from political wonks, actually gives a shit?

    Just get on with it FFS. Why does it need to be so antiquated?

  • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    So he omitted it as a protest and has ended up having to say it anyway.

    Not sure what this has achieved really.

        • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m not saying that he wasn’t I’m just saying that now more people are aware of republicanism growing in a country that seemed to love their monarchy just a few years ago.

          • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Most of the respect for the monarchy came from admiration of the Queen.

            So it may have dipped slightly, but the monarchy isn’t going anywhere.

    • FelixCress@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You were trying to avoid hitting this tree and have ended hitting it anyway.

      Not sure what this has achieved really.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Norwich South MP did not refer to “his heirs and successors” after a mention of the king when he said during a swearing in last week: “I take this oath under protest and in the hope that one day my fellow citizens will democratically decide to live in a republic.

    “Until that time I do solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King Charles, according to law.”

    Lewis said on X on Tuesday: “After omitting to swear allegiance to King Charles’ ‘heirs and successors’ last week, I’ve had to take the oath again in order to sit in the House of Commons.

    He also posted a photo of a letter he received from the House of Commons Journal Office, which said his omission of part of the oath meant there was “doubt about whether the manner in which you made the affirmation is legally valid”.

    His colleague Claire Hanna prefaced it in Irish and English when she was sworn in, saying: “In friendship and in hope of a reconciled new Ireland, my allegiance is to the people of Belfast South and Mid Down & I say these words in order to serve them.”

    He adjourned the session after about 36 minutes, with the remaining handful of MPs who are yet to be sworn in expected to do so on Wednesday afternoon before the king’s speech debate.


    The original article contains 495 words, the summary contains 239 words. Saved 52%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh grow up. This is like literally the least worst thing that’s happened so I really like it if possibly you could get a grip.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The leader of Northern Ireland’s Social Democratic and Labour party, Colum Eastwood, last week said he was making his oath “under protest” and that his true allegiance was to the “people of Derry and the people of Ireland”.

    His colleague Claire Hanna prefaced it in Irish and English when she was sworn in, saying: “In friendship and in hope of a reconciled new Ireland, my allegiance is to the people of Belfast South and Mid Down & I say these words in order to serve them.”

    The Irish know what’s up.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t get what’s firing up these anti-monarchy people. I don’t give a shit about the King or the royal family or anything but they wield absolutely no power, it’s a huge part of our culture and history, they bring money into the country, and many people love it. All they do is turn up at events and try to stop people enjoying themselves. There’s far more important things to be complaining about.

    That being said, I think he should have been allowed not to say that part, simply because it doesn’t matter.

    • samc@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Firstly, I reckon it’s debatable whether having an active monarchy is a net gain financially (how much could we charge for admission to Buckingham Palace?).

      But, for me at least, it’s simply a matter of principle. I believe we are all born equal, and that nobody should be given special treatment due to something as trivial as their ancestry. Having a monarchy flies directly in the face of many values I think we as a nation value deeply.

      Also they have a lot of land that their great great … Grandad nicked from the Saxons and I wouldn’t mind that being nationalised.