With little warning, the American Museum of Natural History in New York abruptly closed almost 10,000 square feet of Native American exhibitions on Jan. 26. The reason? New regulations from the Biden administration to enforce a 1990 law known as the Native American Graves Repatriation Act.
Like most legislation, this law has a defensible idea at its core. Clearly, it is a sensitive matter if people display Native skeletons in museums, especially if they were dug out of their graves at a time when tribal rights of consent were not considered.
However, repeated whip-cracking by Biden-appointed officials at the Department of the Interior has made the situation so difficult that museums with almost any Native American artifacts are finding it impossible to maintain their displays without interference.
The law was originally intended to protect actual human remains from grave-robbing, but now it has been extended to include every sort of Native American artifact, including historical canoes and wampum belts.
And the damage goes far deeper than most people realize. According to the anthropologist Elizabeth Weiss of San Jose State University, the fervor for the reburial of Native bones means that skeletons thousands of years old, which bear no cultural or direct genetic relation to any modern tribe, are being removed from archaeology collections. This effectively removes them from the scientific record, making crucial studies about modern Natives’ ancient ancestors — for example, genetic testing to trace long-lost lineages or establish ancient tribal movements — impossible.
In this way, the Biden administration is erasing Native history.
Recognized tribes, many of which contain no trained archaeologists or anthropologists whatsoever, are being given the right to veto any display that pertains to their modern geographical region.
Just because they don’t have archeologists or anthropologists by title doesn’t mean they don’t know the history of the artifacts. Plus, it’s their stuff, they have a right to it.
As a result, many museums are simply shutting their exhibitions down or giving their collections away.
Why don’t you just ask the Native Americans what they want? It’s possible they are fine with it or want the exhibit altered to be allowed to stay.
The Secretary of the Interior is a Native American. She would know better than any non-Native museum curator what should be done with Native artifacts.
Let the tribes decide how to tell their stories.
We have a
black friendindigenous Secretary of the Interior who says it’s not racist, so it’s fine.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
However, repeated whip-cracking by Biden-appointed officials at the Department of the Interior has made the situation so difficult that museums with almost any Native American artifacts are finding it impossible to maintain their displays without interference.
According to the anthropologist Elizabeth Weiss of San Jose State University, the fervor for the reburial of Native bones means that skeletons thousands of years old, which bear no cultural or direct genetic relation to any modern tribe, are being removed from archaeology collections.
Based on this same misguided attitude that lived experience trumps science, museums have already been reinventing themselves as theme parks where hearsay and superstition are presented as historical fact, and with far fewer artifacts on display.
In popular culture, the effect of the museum closures is similar to the renaming of sports teams such as the Cleveland Indians, the retirement of iconic brands such as the Jeep Cherokee and even the banning of Native American Halloween costumes.
If the current trend continues, though, we will face a situation in 20 years where the very idea of the Native American will have all but disappeared from global culture — an anachronism as dated as Puritanism or the temperance movement.
If the absurd idea that lived experience trumps science is allowed to reshape our museums and other places of scientific inquiry, we face a rapid descent into a new post-scientific Dark Ages.
The original article contains 635 words, the summary contains 230 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
The words In this way are doing some incredibly heavy lifting down there at the end. I am thoroughly impressed.
What scientific value does stealing artifacts to put into museums have?
