- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
According to the debate, they had their reasons. But still – when one hundred and eighty six nations say one thing, and two say another, you have to wonder about the two.
According to the debate, they had their reasons. But still – when one hundred and eighty six nations say one thing, and two say another, you have to wonder about the two.
Why would food not be a right if it was imperialis?
The conflict being Israel vs Palestine. Israel claims food is not a human right because they’ve been starving the Palestinians by destroying olive groves, denying food entry, destroying rain water tanks, filling wells with concrete, etc for half a century.
That’s interesting, I didn’t know that.