Hey all,
In light of recent events concerning one of our communities (/c/vegan), we (as a team) have spent the last week working on how to address better some concerns that had arisen between the moderators of that community and the site admin team. We always strive to find a balance between the free expression of communities hosted here and protecting users from potentially harmful content.
We as a team try to stick to a general rule of respect and consideration for the physical and mental well-being of our users when drafting new rules and revising existing ones. Furthermore, we’ve done our best to try to codify these core beliefs into the additions to the ToS and a new by-laws section.
ToS Additions
That being said, we will be adding a new section to our “terms of service” concerning misinformation. While we do try to be as exact as reasonably able, we also understand that rules can be up to interpretation as well. This is a living document, and users are free to respectfully disagree. We as site admins will do our best to consider the recommendations of all users regarding potentially revising any rules.
Regarding misinformation, we’ve tried our best to capture these main ideas, which we believe are very reasonable:
- Users are encouraged to post information they believe is true and helpful.
- We recommend users conduct thorough research using reputable scientific sources.
- When in doubt, a policy of “Do No Harm”, based on the Hippocratic Oath, is a good compass on what is okay to post.
- Health-related information should ideally be from peer-reviewed, reproducible scientific studies.
- Single studies may be valid, but often provide inadequate sample sizes for health-related advice.
- Non-peer-reviewed studies by individuals are not considered safe for health matters.
We reserve the right to remove information that could cause imminent physical harm to any living being. This includes topics like conversion therapy, unhealthy diets, and dangerous medical procedures. Information that could result in imminent physical harm to property or other living beings may also be removed.
We know some folks who are free speech absolutists may disagree with this stance, but we need to look out for both the individuals who use this site and for the site itself.
By-laws Addition
We’ve also added a new by-laws section as well as a result of this incident. This new section is to better codify the course of action that should be taken by site and community moderators when resolving conflict on the site, and also how to deal with dormant communities.
This new section provides also provides a course of action for resolving conflict with site admin staff, should it arise. We want both the users and moderators here to feel like they have a voice that is heard, and essentially a contact point that they can feel safe going to, to “talk to the manager” type situation, more or less a new Lemmy.World HR department that we’ve created as a result of what has happened over the last week.
Please feel free to raise any questions in this thread. We encourage everyone to please take the time to read over these new additions detailing YOUR rights and how we hope to better protect everyone here.
https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/#80-misinformation
https://legal.lemmy.world/bylaws/
Sincerely,
FHF / LemmyWorld Operations Team
EDIT:
We will be releasing a separate post regarding the moderation incident in the next 24-48 hours, just getting final approval from the team.
Can someone explain to me the context behind the incident that caused this? I am entirely out of the loop.
Vegans advocated for feeding cats vegan diets (which, cats being obligate carnivores, is equivalent to slowly torturing them to death), admin (rightfully but possibly excessively hamfistedly, though not unusually so for a lemmy.world admin) shut it down, vegan animal abusers got a bit histerical about the whole thing.
Actually, it would be the opposite of torture, since it seems to make them healthier.
Some additional context is that the vegan animal abusers immediately banned anyone who was trying to correct this misinformation.
That’s just how vegan communities operate from what I’ve seen
lemmy a year ago may have provided that, lemmy today will be unlikely to, lemmy next year will be indistinguishable from reddit as it is today
Mainly because of the admins
This thread. Apparently the dietary requirements of cats is a contentious topic.
edit: Sorry also this thread that I hadn’t seen before.
It’s only contentious for vegans. No one else thinks cats can be vegan
… and yet here we are.
that’s like saying round earth is a contentious topic. some people will believe anything.
Noone else has considered it, and they are going with their gut reaction rather than consider both sides. Isnt the internet a fun place!
ask your vet if they have considered the topic of vegan cats.
Ugh I can’t tell if this is trolling. I got a sentence and and noped the fuck out. Getting a group of humans together in an online setting without being ridiculous is f’n hard.
If you are a vegan and want animal companionship, get a vegan pet!! Rabbits, birds, and guinea pigs are great options. Cats and dogs are not options for meatless pets, regardless of how avaliable they are.
FWIW having pets who eat meat isn’t incompatible for most vegans. In fact it is likely that a majority of pet owners who are vegan have dogs and cats and feed them normal pet foods
And that’s fine! I just meant that if you’re looking for a pet that can be 100% vegan alongside you, there are definitely options for that.
Thank you medical professional who surely also has experience with nutrition.
There there pet.