ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Data is Beautiful@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoWho Stops a "Bad Guy With a Gun"?slrpnk.netimagemessage-square261fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageWho Stops a "Bad Guy With a Gun"?slrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Data is Beautiful@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square261fedilinkfile-text
More info https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/06/22/us/shootings-police-response-uvalde-buffalo.html
minus-squareAdComfortable1514@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoSo its 64-131 between work done by bystanders vs. work done by police? And casualty rate is actually lower for bystanders doing the work (with their guns) than the police?
minus-squareChefdano3@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoWhere on this chart does it show casualty rate per incident?
minus-squarechatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoJust the casualty rate of the perpetrator, not the victims.
minus-squareAdComfortable1514@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 months agoI count casualty_rate = number_shot / (number_shot + number_subdued) Which in this case is 22/64 = 34% casualty rate for civilians and 98/131 = 75% casualty rate for police
So its 64-131 between work done by bystanders vs. work done by police?
And casualty rate is actually lower for bystanders doing the work (with their guns) than the police?
Where on this chart does it show casualty rate per incident?
Just the casualty rate of the perpetrator, not the victims.
I count casualty_rate = number_shot / (number_shot + number_subdued)
Which in this case is 22/64 = 34% casualty rate for civilians
and 98/131 = 75% casualty rate for police