I managed to hop through the rest of the substack. The author further speculates that Elon Musk can control UPSes from satellite using “lasers”. (Mention of which is a “breadcrumb” that those elites can’t help but leave for us.)
DTC doesn’t require routers, towers, or a traditional SIM. It connects directly from satellite to any compatible device—including embedded modems in “air-gapped” voting systems, smart UPS units, or unsecured auxiliary hardware.
From that moment on:
Commands could be sent from orbit
Patch delivery became invisible to domestic monitors
Compromised devices could be triggered remotely
To support these ostentatious claims, they just have the graphs about how badly Kamala Harris lost. And of course the lack of evidence is actually evidence itself because of a perfect, error-proof “ballot scrubbing” technology; another hidden in plain sight clue. So forensic evidence is impossible. Hence the charts.
Hope they demo this whole chain of events during their talk (or in court), that would be cool. It would be a lot more convincing than all these loser charts.
I mean thats assuming default behavior and no hardening on the OS layer.
Still this is a super interesting attack vector and I would love to hear more about it. Here’s hoping we get a decent explanation at Defcon
I managed to hop through the rest of the substack. The author further speculates that Elon Musk can control UPSes from satellite using “lasers”. (Mention of which is a “breadcrumb” that those elites can’t help but leave for us.)
To support these ostentatious claims, they just have the graphs about how badly Kamala Harris lost. And of course the lack of evidence is actually evidence itself because of a perfect, error-proof “ballot scrubbing” technology; another hidden in plain sight clue. So forensic evidence is impossible. Hence the charts.
Hope they demo this whole chain of events during their talk (or in court), that would be cool. It would be a lot more convincing than all these loser charts.