• Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        By your logic, anyone who votes for anyone is “helping” someone else.

        If I truly wanted to help Trump, I would have voted for him—not a third-party candidate. So no, I didn’t help Trump. I also didn’t help Harris–and that’s your main point.

        And I’m proud I didn’t help Harris. Because I didn’t want to vote for her. Thank you! :)

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I didn’t especially “want” to brush my teeth last night, but I did anyway. Because I know that the alternative is opening up the door to things I don’t want, even more than I don’t want to brush my teeth.

          If someone woke up and said, I’m proud I didn’t brush my teeth, because I didn’t want to, I would have trouble looking at them as a source of wisdom about how to accomplish the goals they’re trying to pursue.

          • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            1 month ago

            Cute analogy, But that doesn’t apply to voting because voting isn’t a routine obligation—it’s an opportunity to choose what you believe in.

            Just like choosing not to brush your teeth doesn’t change the necessity of dental hygiene, choosing to vote third party isn’t ignoring reality, it’s actively rejecting a system that fails to represent true change. Thanks! :)

            • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 month ago

              Just like choosing not to brush your teeth doesn’t change the necessity of dental hygiene

              choosing to vote third party isn’t ignoring reality

              You’re so close to getting it. Millimeters away.

                • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Yeah, for Trump. Because that’s what a vote for Jill Stein is.

                  Your refusal to accept reality in circular logic does not make you correct.

                  • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    No, they’re voting for Pro-Israel candidate Rachele Fruit. Quoted earlier this year:

                    And anyone who is interested in reading and learning about the history of Hamas will be convinced that it’s not about liberation. It’s about genocide against the Jews.

                  • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    17
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    No, a vote for Trump is a vote for Trump. A vote for Stein is a vote for Stein.

                    I’ve already voted. And I didn’t vote for Stein. Or Trump. Or Harris. Thank you! :)

            • finley@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              But that doesn’t apply to voting because voting isn’t a routine obligation

              Voting is routine and an obligation. Brushing those one’s teeth is not “a moral or legal duty”. Your reasoning is flawed.

                • finley@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Nobody claimed that voting was compulsory. Just an obligation. Those aren’t the same thing.

                  So you know that what you said was false. Then why did you say that?

            • finley@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Rejecting the system by participating in it? And how does a candidate that will definitely never win “represent change“?