• goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    They seem to dislike france’s freedom of speech and their anti-islam stance.

    … No, it does not make sense. I don’t have a clue.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      I think it has more to do with Macron and his bedding of right-wing fascists to avoid a left-wing government coalition

      That, and their funding of religious ethnostate terrorists…

      • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Yes, the dislike of a democratically elected leader is reasonable clause to call for innocent french people to die in a massacre

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          I didn’t say it was reasonable, I was only answering the question as to why they were angry with France.

          I think what the west deserves for funding a genocidal fascist is entirely up for debate, but that they deserve something is pretty well justified, IMHO

          • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            I think what the west deserves for funding a genocidal fascist is entirely up for debate, but that they deserve something is pretty well justified, IMHO

            Are you trying to say the West deserves violence? Advocating for violence isn’t allowed in this community or instance.

              • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                And what will this justice be? Because the post is saying a massacre.

                I think it’s pretty telling you were advocating for violence, and now you’re forced to backtrack.

                • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  I wasn’t advocating for anything, I was answering the question about why they were angry with the french.

                  And what will this justice be?

                  If it were me, i’d say the west should face international sanction and prosecution in the Hague for all leaders/diplomats accused of willfully collaborating with a genocide. Of course, a western-controlled criminal court would never do such a thing, so I guess all we have is BDS and public protest.

                  • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    16 days ago

                    You italicised something. Implying violence as per the post.

                    International sanctions? How would that even work? You can’t sanction over half the world, let alone prosecute them. Why does New Zealand get sanctioned? Why Europe? Why Canada? What about countries that are collaborating in the Ukraine-Russia war? How about congo?

                    This is a fantasy

            • Tangentism@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              Maybe the west should lay off the fucking violence themselves and not bleat when it gets dished back to them once in a while.

              • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 days ago

                The West? All of the West? You hear that New Zealand?! You cowards!

                But legitimately, ‘dished back to them?’ – Not very pro-peace of you. Violence begets violence. You should aim for peace, not more war.

                • Tangentism@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Point to on the doll where I was advocating violence.

                  The reading comprehension of people nowadays is shockingly poor because if it was better, you would have grasped that I was pointing out that it’s fairly hypocritical to go around being a cunt to other countries then cry like a fucking baby when they do the same shit back to you.

                  • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    12 days ago

                    Maybe the west should lay off the fucking violence themselves and not bleat when it gets dished back to them once in a while.

                    I was pointing out that it’s fairly hypocritical to go around being a cunt to other countries then cry like a fucking baby when they do the same shit back to you.

                    The reading comprehension of people nowadays is shockingly poor

          • YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            I didn’t say it was reasonable

            This is true, and we’ll all let you continue to hide behind what you say directly while you are here defending the stance “of which you didn’t directly state”.

            Take your doublespeak elsewhere 🤷