Vote for the change you want to see.

The Republican party got remade because trumpists showed up and outvoted the party elites. No reason it can’t happen for the Left except for laziness and apathy.

If all the progressives furious about the state of affairs now had shown up for Sanders in 2016, I doubt we’d be in this hellish timeline. Sadly, he needed the young progressive vote to show up.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Do you understand how superdelegates work? they’re not assigned by vote.

    As well, the Bernie campaign was blocked from accessing the voter rolls because they reported a bug to the DNC that allowed them to view stuff the clinton campaign was doing. They did not exploit it, they just reported it.

    Also, did you read that hacked/leaked memo where the DNC chair admitted to intentionally sabotaging Bernie’s campaign? no one has ever contested the contents of that memo. in fact the DNC chair resigned over it. (and you’re an idiot if you think Hilary wasn’t pressuring the DNC chair to do just that. Hilary always has someone else to throw under her campaign bus.)

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. And then she went and hid under Hillary’s skirts, like she was an enabled naughty child, rather than a malicious, feckless adult woman.

    • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe you don’t?

      Sanders didn’t win a majority of the votes so whether the super delegates would’ve over-ridden the votes is fairly irrelevant.

      You can argue it wasn’t a completely balanced playing field but there was nothing stopping us from winning the votes except for our refusal to show up rather than bitch online.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Iowa was a hair thin win for clinton, New Hampshire was an overwhelming win for Bernie.

        And that’s when they the DNC started fucking with the Bernie campaign. The superdelegates piling in was making it further impossible for Bernie to win.

        The DNC should just stop pretending it actually cares what it’s base thinks. it’s not like they’re legally obligated to run a primary anyway.

        Also. you do know that candidates in the primary rely on equal access to the voter rolls precisely to reach potential voters and turn out the vote, right? that database was what they DNC cut Bernie off of.

        what makes you think I didn’t vote for Bernie?

        “it wasn’t a level playing field, but you could have still won!” is such a bitchdick move, it’s hilarious. we will never know what Bernie could have done had they not interfered in the primary. Similarly we won’t know just how far the DNC would have gone to prevent a Bernie win.

        they did enough to break Bernie’s momentum and then Hilary fucking lost the main election. in part because she was an arrogant fool and ignored Michigan.

        people like you. You’re the people that practically gave trump the win on a silver platter.

        • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          2 months ago

          The superdelegates weren’t bound to Clinton. If Sanders had kept winning the vote they’d be hard pressed to over-ride the people.

          I’m not saying you didn’t vote for Bernie, I’m saying not enough people did. This blaming superdelegates is nonsense. Democracy is dificult, people die just to make a protest vote but somehow the fact that Clinton had a lead in uncommitted delegates is too much of a burden? Give me a break. If you want a revolution but can’t actually get the majority of leftist voters to the polls, well, that’s on us.

      • missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Are you acknowledging that there was indeed foul play, just to then handwave it away and say no one should object to said foul play because we lost?

        • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nope. Maybe re-read the sentence carefully:

          The superdelegates weren’t bound to Clinton. If Sanders had kept winning the vote they’d be hard pressed to over-ride the people.

          At the end of the day, Sanders had 43% of the vote compared to Clinton’s 55%. That doesn’t involve super delegates, that’s just not enough progressives showed up to win. Pretty simple stuff.

          Like, I love the folks claiming we need a revolution etc are also stymied by the need to get the majority of Left leaning Americans to agree with them.

      • rishado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        People like you are the reason Democrats can’t unite fyi, reducing problems of people who did exactly what you’re saying and got shat on once again

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        More young people voted in 2016 than ever before. We showed up. The boomers overwhelmed us.

        • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yup. Young votes don’t show up to the general or primaries at anywhere near the same rate as boomers. And sadly, democracy caters more to those who vote.