no banana@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 days agorule of calciumlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1539arrow-down14
arrow-up1535arrow-down1external-linkrule of calciumlemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 days agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareWIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·11 days agoYou do know that steel reinforced necromantic constructs have been outlawed since the great wizard convention of 1848??
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·11 days agoOutlawed, yes, but that doesn’t preclude their use by nefarious interests.
minus-squareWIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 days agoYou are correct. It does however seem highly unlikely that such a construct would be placed inside a museum though. Anyone having to do anything with it would immediately be investigated by the wizard police.
minus-squareno banana@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 days agoI, for one, think that skeletal improvement might be a desirable pursuit.
minus-squareI Cast Fist@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 days agoPfft, who the hell even reads wizarding texts?
minus-squareWIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 days agoThat is common knowledge among educated necromancer.
You do know that steel reinforced necromantic constructs have been outlawed since the great wizard convention of 1848??
Outlawed, yes, but that doesn’t preclude their use by nefarious interests.
You are correct. It does however seem highly unlikely that such a construct would be placed inside a museum though. Anyone having to do anything with it would immediately be investigated by the wizard police.
I, for one, think that skeletal improvement might be a desirable pursuit.
Pfft, who the hell even reads wizarding texts?
That is common knowledge among educated necromancer.