It’s not a crazier idea than most of Kennedy’s. Someone should do a study. Or make one up, nobody checks anymore.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Couldn’t you still study populations with more or less plastic, even if “zero plastic” cant be found? Or is the amount of it more or less even across groups?

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        The stressors and demands on people a single generation separate are so vastly different that it would not work.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Wouldn’t work in a serious scientific study, no. You’re absolutely correct. But since we’re setting the bar of inquiry at Kennedy levels…?

          I’m just trying to put aside my despair for a few minutes.

          • WraithGear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            I am having to admit that human kindness and empathy only extends to one and theirs and to all others only competition and hate, that is the hallmark of humanity. The greatest trick ever performed was convincing anyone that it was ever not thus.

    • Neuromancer49@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Throwing in my $0.02, a correlation study is technically an option, where you look at differences as microplastics increase in concentration. But. my instinct is you would see some really unfortunate covariance - that is, another variable that increases (or decreases) at the same time as microplastics and is known to impact your variable of interest, e.g. socioeconomic status.