• theedqueen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Yes, please. Protecting and solidifying rights in the areas we can is the only way we can get through this nightmare. Hopefully progressives can claw back from this although it’s going to take generations.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Literally the civil war started because kansas didn’t want to be a slave state. The whole state’s right thing is just a talking point not a held belief.

        • Deello@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Are you saying the next civil war will be fought over abortion and LGBTQ rights?

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            I think it’s more likely blue states secede than civil war. If enough liberal folks got on board, the conservatives would bit at the chance to be the new USA with a majority of the states.

            I also think the impetus won’t be social, it will be economic.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            I’m just saying the whole “state’s rights” things is sort of a red herring. The right believes they don’t have to follow the rules; “crimes are when undesireables do things only I should be allowed to do”

  • Error 404: User Not Found@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Honestly I’d feel safer if we reduce the power of the federal government and put the power to the states. Sorry left-leaning people in red states, can’t let states like yours drag the country down with you.

    • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      As someone in a swing state, I’d be ok with that. Make the US like the EU.

      For one thing, every 4 years residents of swing states get relentlessly harassed and it fucking sucks. But also It’s so so much easier to make changes on a smaller local level without the influence of distant populations. Sure it would suck in some ways and for some states, but maybe if each state only had to convince a few thousand people to do better, rather than literally millions (presidential election, very demoralizing), swing states would be more left leaning.

      And if not, well it would probably be a lot easier to move states than move countries, even if they were EU style countries.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        After all, you don’t need to learn a new language or integrate into a new culture when you move. People move in Europe all the time, and the US states is easy mode compared to that

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    No concrete plans yet but we’ll see what they can do. Good to see that some people haven’t given up all hope.

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do not give up hope. Don’t stop trying to make the world a better place. As long as we have people that take action, we still have hope.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        5th largest economy in the world, motherfuckers!

        We don’t need the US, but their military means we’re fucked should we ever try, anyway

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        23 hours ago

        A constitutional crisis is very likely over the next 4 years. And if it does, all bets are off.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          The crisis already happened when the SC declared the President a dictator and Biden didn’t have them executed for it with the powers they just gave him.

          • Error 404: User Not Found@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Technically they said Presidents and Former Presidents cannot be prosecuted for it, not give them the authority to. You still have to find a “yes-man” to obey those orders. Biden can try, tell the military to kill SCOTUS members for treason, they say “Sorry Mr. President No-can-do”. Biden might be immune for trying to do it.

            *keyword “might” be, but Scotus can say “that was not an official act”

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              21 hours ago

              *keyword “might” be, but Scotus can say “that was not an official act”

              In this thought experiment, they would certainly not be able to say that because they wouldn’t exist anymore.

              Any new justices would certainly certainly hold the Biden-preferred opinion, because otherwise he wouldn’t nominate them. (That opinion would neither be “Biden is immune and this is fine” nor “that was not an official act,” but rather “we’re overturning the previous decision and making the President prosecutable for illegal official acts again,” because forcing that ruling would be the entire point of the exercise, BTW.)

              • Error 404: User Not Found@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                In this thought experiment, they would certainly not be able to say that because they wouldn’t exist anymore.

                Bruh my brain is so filled with election anxiety that I don’t even realize this fact 🤣

                But the point remains, the military would never obey such orders. Biden would have to quickly fire the chain of commands until he finds such commander, find a unit in the military willing to perform such illegal act, carry out the act, then get senate to confirm new justices. Oh btw Democrats still believe in the rule of law, senate Democrats would never approve this, even if he orders 50 of the most conservative members killed (50 is quorum btw) there wouldn’t be 25 democrats willing to confirm them. What would happen is republican house would impeach biden along with like 90% of democrats voting in favor, then the senate would probably like 40/50 dems voting to convict. Democrats would lose the electoral college like all the swing states against whatever republican is running, even if he tries to get the entire republican ticket killed, since non voting republicans would be raging against democrats. The Democratic party would have to disband and form another party to try to rebrand.

                I mean Biden is not a dictator, he can only do what average Democratic politicians in congress would deem acceptable. I mean at this point its just political fan-fiction. This is civil war territory and any speculation would sound surreal and ridiculus.

                (The results of this election is already surreal enough)

    • Sunshine @lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      True, at least the magas don’t have full control of every state government.