New one in Poland is every bit as much proukrainian as the previous one though.
Did the vote share or number of votes for the party against sending weapons/money to Ukraine increase?
There is only one party in Polish mainstream politics that is nominally against or at least neutral for war in Ukraine and it is sadly the libertarian/nazi/monarchist Konfederacja, last elections in 2023 they got 1 547 364 votes, that is 7,16% which is 18 seats in sejm (on 460). In previous election 2019 they got 1 256 953 vots that is 6,81%, 11 seats.
That was pretty easy considering Poland have basically no new weapons, mostly old junk. Also he only do this when the internal little war seems to finally start in Poland, PO wants to trial several prominent PiS politicians but seems to wait for presidental election next year because Dupa will just pardon them otherwise, so he did this to spite them. Another reason might be that even a moron like him see the writing on the wall for Ukraine, especially considering the turmoil in Washington.
That was pretty easy considering Poland have basically no new weapons, mostly old junk.
Poland received new weapons from S. Korea in October, and Duda said it in relation to those new weapons.
Huh i thought that the tank deal was cancelled and the only thing that’s arriving were the planes. That’s very worrying honestly that Poland after 35 years finally signed a big weapon deal that don’t seem to be a complete fuckup, and that they dared to buy something not in USA or Germany.
Non socialist Poland should not be decently armed, ever.
they dared to buy something not in USA or Germany
Because they don’t have anything to sell. US promised to sell new replacements to every EU country who sent their old stock to Ukraine, there’s a waiting list, I imagine.
That’s the case in most of these countries. I think we will see the same pattern repeat all over Europe: the Ukraine war and associated self-damaging policies are deeply unpopular, the incumbent party loses the elections as a consequence (perhaps not as a direct consequence but indirectly because of fallout effects such as de-industrialization), they get replaced with an opposition that proceeds to do exactly the same things as the previous government, nothing changes, rinse and repeat. Until the crisis in Europe becomes so bad the entire dam breaks…
I do think we are starting to see the dam break in France and Germany already. It’s true that they’re tilting right, but the parties that are gaining ground are the ones that are explicitly against the war. I expect that if either France or Germany came out against the war then the whole project Ukraine would collapse overnight because those are the two countries that really matter in EU.
Yes and no. I think that comes down to how much America engages in a sunken-cost fallacy. Complete collapse of support in Europe would be bad for them, but for some reason in the back of my mind I’ve had the idea that America is preparing a giant “comfort package” in exchange for access to the Bosporus (full, not limited). I don’t think Turkey is opposed to “any side” specifically, rather more focused on it’s own affairs and the possibility of having it’s trade damaged.
Some guarantees, chunks of cash and a look in the other way in Syria (already happening but I mean carte blanche) I’m almost sure Turkey would “take a side”. With all the statements about “to the last ukrainian” from one soldier I’m wondering if America would really give up that easy if France and Germany pulled out regardless.
Turkey might be able to get some deals because they’re in a good bargaining position, but their relations with EU are increasingly cooling. So, I expect they’re just going to continue to play both sides between G7 and BRICS since they’re in a strategic geographic position.
With regards to US support for Ukraine, my expectation is that they now realize the project has run its course, and they are going to start focusing on West Asia and China. Europe will be left holding the bag on this. If dems won, then they probably would’ve stayed committed through 2025, but there’s very little chance Trump admin will be interested in doing that.
This is true. I just wonder if some sort of bidding war there will start. America starts throwing money and China starts offering infrastructure, an educated workforce, etc. Curious to see if Turkey will ever pick a side. I mean, they are in an amazing spot and I can imagine either side throwing the gauntlet down. Or maybe they’d just prefer Turkey in this position. Either or could work depending on what changes in the next year.
I could see that too. I could also see MIC ghouls convincing Trump to “step it down a bit” instead of completely abandoning it under the guise of “well there is still equipment left there and Biden did something similar in Afghanistan” and avoid active interference like the Biden administration and sitting on the periphery while Ukraine fights with what it has left.
America likes to do long-hauls even at complete expense of foreign and domestic opinion. So I’m genuinely curious if this war will actually end now or if it will just sputter out over time.
They definitely are gonna start focusing on China. With full Republican control I’m genuinely curious to see if they’re more or less gonna go full hawk considering the last administration.
I just wonder if some sort of bidding war there will start.
If that happens China will not have the upper hand. It has one big advantage over the US which is its overwhelmingly superior productive capabilities, but the US has two things going for it:
Firstly they control the dollar and they can print as much of it as they need to bribe pretty much anyone. And sure without productive capacity all of that is just worthless paper but the problem is that China still accepts that worthless paper in exchange for its physically tangible and actually valuable goods.
And the second, which i think gets overlooked a lot in Marxist geopolitical analyses, is that the US ruling class is fanatical whereas China’s is pragmatic. Someone who is irrational and fanatical makes more mistakes but they also are also always going to be willing to stake more and go harder than someone who is being reasonable and cautious. This factor should not be underestimated.
For all the great things that can be said about the current Chinese leadership, which i do think still genuinely believes in socialism, the one thing they don’t have to the same extent as they did in the Mao era is revolutionary zeal. the willingness to take big risks, make any sacrifices necessary, and the confident belief - an almost religious-like faith if you will - that you are bound to win. This is something the USSR had during the Great Patriotic War, we can see it today in the Axis of Resistance, and we also see it in the liberal fanaticism of the western imperialists, but i just don’t see it in China. But idk maybe this is all bullshit and i’m just being idealistic here…
No you have a point. Reasonably, wouldn’t it make sense that China would be curious on investing/pushing more political influence onto Turkey/seek more control of trade into Europe where another major market is? Or are we analyzing this from the perspective of a capitalist country? Perhaps, China has no interest in pushing into new markets but rather developing and pushing their own. They might not have Maoist zeal, but they do a lot of work in Belt and Road and focus more on economic help to developing countries rather than trying to exert influence or control.
It might be the ‘pragmatic’ mindset in the sense that they seek development mainly in all fields. They aren’t interested in waging a war, or “winning” anything but rather developing the nation so it could compete in all fields in the future. More productive forces, more natural resources to tap into to serve the working class and nation, more research into fields of science to which we’ve seen the effects of what happens. They dominate science publications, they have plentiful resources in their own nation and they’re dominating the world in manufacturing.
Diplomatically; they offer a stable platform and more reason to their mindset than the constant carnival of elected officials that U.S parades around. I’m just surprised they haven’t targeted Turkey with any of their initiatives diplomatically; would be useful to put pressure on Europe during this time but I suppose not.
I don’t actually think the dollar matters all that much at this point. China is increasingly moving towards trade outside the dollar, and that trend will continue going forward. China is not stupid, and they understand that they’re the next target for US aggression. So, what they’re doing is quietly shifting their trade away from the west.
I also wouldn’t underestimate Chinese resolve, they understand that time is on their side and they want to avoid provoking a conflict as long as possible. However, that doesn’t mean they’re not prepared for it or that they’re not going to defend their interests when push comes to shove.
Finally, it’s important to note just how unstable all western states are now becoming internally. There are very serious economic problems across the west, and these problems will only increase as competition with BRICS ramps up. These problems are driving political unrest all across the west, and I think that will make it very difficult for western regimes. to pursue any sort of coherent geopolitical policy. In fact, we’re already starting to see infighting happening within Europe as well as between Europe and US.
I think Turkey might be forced to pick a side because the west traditionally can’t cope with countries being neutral. I expect Turkey will end up in BRICS in the end however.
Meanwhile, the US can try to step it down, but the reality is that the AFU is already collapsing with the current level of support. The US is basically the only country that’s actually capable of providing any meaningful support as well. If that starts drying up then the collapse will accelerate. Even with the current level of support, the real issue as even western media now admits is manpower. It doesn’t matter how many weapons make it to Ukraine if there’s nobody left to use them.
It’s very important to understand that Russia is fighting a war of attrition. The goal is to grind down the AFU until it implodes. There is nothing the west can do to stop that short of NATO putting boots on the ground. I can’t really see that happening.
We have grazed the lathe; wasn’t fully right. Should have expected Zionazis on the bingo.
I expect Turkey will end up in BRICS in the end however.
I’d like to believe that, but I don’t know enough to have an opinion on where they will land.
True, if France and Germany bail it’s game over, but i don’t see it happening just yet. We’re not getting AfD any time soon in Germany, we’re getting CDU again, most likely either with FDP or even SPD again. And as for France, the centrists have managed to successfully defraud the left of its electoral victory. In order to cling to power they will likely enter into an alliance with the nationalist right, but there is no reason to believe that LePen would behave any differently than a Meloni or a Wilders. These right wing “populists” are all talk during elections but when they get power they just bend the knee to NATO and the EU. The dam break has to happen eventually because the deterioration of material conditions will make it unavoidable, but i think the time frame we’re looking at is longer than some people hope. Not that it matters much because i think Russia is on track to completely collapse the Ukrainian front lines much sooner than that.
Thing is that once the US pulls out there’s little Europe can do in practical terms to keep the war going. The industry needed to produce weapons and ammunition at the scale they’re being used simply does not exist. On top of that, Europe is struggling with high energy prices and a severe economic downturn. The centrists might stay in power for a while longer, but all that’s going to do is further radicalize European public and cause a greater political upheaval down the road.
Yeah, you’re right…i just get frustrated sometimes because i’m really really sick of these assholes. Can’t wait to see them gone.
I can very much relate. When the war started, I expected things to develop a lot faster than they did. The big lesson for me was that everything happens a lot slower than you’d think it would. In a way it’s a testament to human ingenuity. People running Europe continue to find ways to kick the can down the road and cling to power. It won’t last forever, but they certainly surpassed my expectations.
While understanding underlying dynamics provides us with a powerful framework for comprehending how the system evolves, predicting precise details is effectively impossible. In this way, there is always room for uncertainty and surprise. A good analogy is to think of a river flowing downhill. The overarching principle is clear: gravity pulls the water downwards, carving a path of least resistance. Yet, the exact specifics of the river’s course, the meanders, the rapids, the waterfalls, are determined by a myriad of different factors, including the terrain, the volume of water, and even the weather. While we can anticipate that the river should flow in a particular direction, we cannot foresee the precise shape of its journey.
We’re not getting AfD any time soon in Germany,
You say that as if it’s even remotely a bad thing lol
It definitely wouldn’t be a good thing, that’s for sure, as an immigrant i am acutely aware of that. I’m just saying whichever way you view that possibility, whether you think it would accelerate us even faster into open fascism (though it’s hard to argue that the current regime isn’t fascist when you see how they fund+arm literal Nazis, run cover for a genocide, and persecute journalists and activist groups who dare to go against the accepted narrative) or you think that they are a wild card who may shake things up and possibly do a U-turn on at least the most self-destructive Ukraine policies if not put up some resistance to the NATO-EU Atlanticist project (highly unlikely imo, at the end of the day the right wing’s “populism” is always fake and a cover for giving more money and power to capitalists), there is no reason quite yet to fearmonger/get your hopes up. What we will see is more of the same, more doubling down on sunk cost. The foot is stuck to the accelerator pedal and the car is heading straight for a cliff.
Have the article this is from?
I think the argument that this is directly tied to Ukraine is weakened by the fact that every incumbent lost, not just the ones supporting Ukraine.
https://xcancel.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1854485866548195735
The guy is trying to shine light on why Kamala lost. But Trump promised his followers he’d end the war in Ukraine. Maybe I am wrong, but seems to me that what they have in common is that they all support Ukraine with weapons and/or money.
What they all have in common is that they’re incumbents. The article this appears to be from is paywalled, so we don’t know what all the data points are. There could be some countries in there that don’t support Ukraine, or that support it so little it wouldn’t be a real factor in their elections.
I’m very skeptical of Ukraine (and Palestine) having major direct impacts on the U.S. election because of how little most voters care about any foreign policy issue, sometimes even when it’s U.S. troops directly fighting.
This seems like a worthwhile observation from the comments, though:
Anything that happens in the world gets blamed on the incumbent and than amplified by politically adjacent media sources
No such thing as an “incumbent advantage” anymore given how effective constant negative coverage from oppositional media is
Paywall bypass: https://archive.is/ktYKs
Thanks!
Ultimately voters don’t distinguish between unpleasant things that their leaders and governments have direct control over, and those that are international phenomena resulting from … the warmongering of an ageing autocrat halfway across the world.
“…and we would have created a utopia had it not been for that meddling Putin!”
The cost of living was also the top issue in Britain’s July general election and has been front of mind in dozens of other countries for most of the last two years.
Inflation from borrowing money to send to Ukraine. They’re technically loans, but there’s just no way Ukraine can repay them.
o7
They use the term “developed” for the countries on the list, so I assume they mean “Western” or Western-adjacent countries.
Their data comes from here: https://www.parlgov.org/ I’m on my phone now so it’s inconvenient to download the data and view it.
India sticks out as a country that is not giving significant aid to Ukraine, yet lost votes.
I do think the Ukraine war has had a negative impact on incumbents, it’s just probably a smaller “that’s one more thing that sucks and I’ll blame the incumbent for” than a larger “I’m directly opposed to my government’s support of this” sentiment.
People do not want to keep sending billions to the war. Not to sound like a MAGA but they’re more concerned about domestic problems.
