• SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The next day, the Chrome division is sold off to a new company “Bloogle” and we’re back to square dumb.

    And before you think about applying for a job there, know that the new company is still demanding mandatory 5 days in the office

  • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Why does it need to be sold to another big company, why can’t they just break Google up so chrome becomes its own business?

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Chrome by itself would likely cost 100 billion dollars to sell, and then more to maintain, without any clear revenue except selling user data. Chrome is not a profitable product on its own. Not many companies can afford that.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Well shucks, I guess it should just be made fully open source, the code distributed, and the business dissolved. Womp wooomp.

        • CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The overwhelming majority of development to Chromium is done by Google and not the open source contributors to the project. Maintaining a browser is not something that can be done for free as a hobby. It requires an army of full-time developers to sustain.

          Given all of the browsers except Firefox are using Chromium, the best case scenario for spinning off Chrome is that Microsoft would pick up the lion’s share of development to keep Edge up to date.

          This is the same reason that all of the major Linux distributions have large foundations to support them.

          The DoJ would do less harm to the internet if they just forced Google to sell off Search instead. Then they’d be an advertising and cloud services company that happens to maintain a major browser to serve their ads.

          • pup_atlas@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            There are multiple other browser startups in development that are not Chromium based. Like LadyBird (which is completely independant), and Zen browser (which started as a FF fork)

          • aeharding@vger.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Ehh, I wouldn’t consider Safari “using chromium” at this point. It has been hard forked for years. Chrome could disappear tomorrow and it wouldn’t affect Safari development.

  • coolmojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    If Google does not set the price for 200 trillion USD and it can be really bought, then it will be probably M$ and they will change the search engine to Bing and integrate Coplilot or whatever the fuck it is called now into it.

    • Aedis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Pretty sure that would count as monopoly as well and the sale wouldn’t be approved.

        • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Did you consider that Microsoft lawyers said prices wouldn’t go up? Cause they did, they did say that, which is why the merger was approved. Do you think lawyers can just lie? Don’t you think it’s much more fair now that companies can make pinky promises that prices won’t go up before they become more monopolistic. That’s just good business for both customers and businesses /s

  • PrivacyDingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    to me, shaving Android off their business (suggested next step if this fails) would be way more impactful

    • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m worrying that whatever gets sold (Chrome or Android) might end up in the hands of someone even more scummy than Google.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They would have to be more scummy and also at least similarly competent… Google can’t innovate for crap, but they’re pretty good at maintaining projects (when they don’t randomly kill them off)

        If they stop work on chromium, or belief in the stewardship of chromium wanes, it’ll fragment the ecosystem again. Which is sorely needed at this point - we need to get back to standards and away from centralized control

        Imagine Twitter/musk acquires them. Microsoft, Apple, and many other big companies directly or indirectly rely on a chain now controlled by a group known for mismanagement - are they going to wait and see, or are they going to diversify?

          • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 minutes ago

            Someone needs to compile an annual league table of the scummiest companies and their practices for that year.

        • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Chiquita and Nestlé come to mind. Within tech industry, I’d say Amazon and probably Microsoft are worse as well, and there’s probably a ton of potentially even worse companies lurking in the shadows outside the top of the economic food chain.

        • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I don’t know man. There’s a lot shittier business practices out there than paying to be the default search engine - which is laughably easy to change on any browser. Like marketplaces and services that pay to be exclusive sources of content and then use the fact that they’re the only source for most content to force extortionate deals on content creators and enshitify every aspect of the end user experience. Just to name one.

          • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            30 minutes ago

            Did you know that paying to be default search engine isn’t the only business practice that Google does.

            Google has enshitified every single one of its products or deprecated it and then released an inferior replacement.

      • PrivacyDingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        good point, I guess one worry here is about the way in which this will affect Firefox (note Firefox here, not the Mozilla Fdn who have managed to Elon their own thing without help, seemingly)

      • bruhduh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Android also becoming chrome OS in light of recent news of developing Android desktop mode and native Android compatibility with Linux apps, looks like they make hybrid OS that could do it all

  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It will be another tech giant probably amazon or something.

    Enshittification intensifies

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    And what’s to stop it from continuing to monopolize search engine usage just because it’ll be owned by another company? Wouldn’t whoever purchases it just continue operating it the same way, banking on the name recognition?

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    The buyer of chrome could make bing the default search engine and re-enable whatever broke Ublock origin (the ad blocker)

    They could also cripple gapps and gmail a bit. It would also be harder for google to unilaterally develop new web standards.

    That would no doubt consternate a few at Google and knee cap them forcing web shit down our throats that only improves their ad business.

  • j4p@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Good news, but does someone more knowleagable of these things know the likelihood of a Trump DOJ derailing this? I am hopefully as the original case was brought in 2017 under Trump, and his relationship with Big Tech is at best strained, but I truly don’t know what to expect moving forward.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      according to Cory doctorow (pluralistic), trumps gouvernement will likely selectively enforce antitrust, so the Google case would go through, but cases against, say, tesla would be dropped.