• Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    432
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    It’s one thing to mock it on pseudonymous platforms like Reddit and the fediverse.

    It’s another to do it somewhere linked to your real name and job like LinkedIn.

    People really hate insurance companies.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      193
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      Don’t do it under your names folks, regime will be making lists based on this.

      They are scared and they will lash out.

      With that being said, fuck that parasite.

      FAFO

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        113
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        You think having a fake online name will stop them from finding out who you are? Did you even pay attention to the Snowden leaks?

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          61
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Make them spend more resources doing deanonymizations. First they have to get the IP from instance admins, then trace the tor routing, then the VPN that I use, then ask for my ISP. Make them do all that work.

          (Or maybe they already have access by simply activating their backdoors within Intel ME, AMD PSP, and whatever baseband backdoor on the phones they have, and have just gotten everyone’s real identities in an instant, we can’t know for sure.)

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            9 days ago

            They also have backdoors in most implementations of TLS, according to a person I know who worked government security.

            • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              35
              ·
              9 days ago

              It wouldn’t be impossible. There are like so many different certificate issuers, any one of them collaborating with a government would allow them to create a certificate that would be accepted by your browser.

            • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              7 days ago

              I work in cryptography, and I guarantee if that’s true “some person you know who worked in government security” would not tell you if they did know, or they are pulling shit out of their ass. There have been so many people that have looked at or worked on SSL/TLS implementations (including some of my coworkers), any vulnerabilities would have to be pretty subtle or clever, and that would be kept highly classified. Quit making shit up or repeating bullshit you heard.

              • Pennomi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 days ago

                Sure, if we’re talking about code vulnerabilities only. It’s most likely a compromised root cert though.

                • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  That just would allow a malicious attacker to fake being the server, it doesn’t actually compromise the TLS session. So you are talking about a much more sophisticated multi stage attack that needs to be actively executed. This wouldn’t at all allow them to record traffic and decrypt later.

                  The certs authenticate that you are talking to the real server, the symmetric session keys that are usually derived from a diffie helman key exchange have nothing to do with certs. That’s two separate (but connected) parts of the transaction to build a TLS session.

                  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 days ago

                    Right, this would be a MitM vulnerability, which could be reasonably viable for targeted attacks.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 days ago

        They already have lists. The only hope we have is to stand together in solidarity as the working class against the billionaire capitalists entering power.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          i was talking about people commenting on linkedin actually…

          nor did I suggest reddit is anon, but aint you aint got provide your full name and address.

    • NotBillMurray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      LinkedIn is one of the least sane social media sites I’ve ever had the displeasure of using. Under all the marketing BS and obviously fake feel good stories lie takes that would make your insane Facebook uncle blush.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 days ago

      People are too hung up about anonimity on the internet. When one of my country’s worst journalistic shitrags mandated a real name policy due to the rampant racism and other -isms in the comment section of their articles… nothing changed. People are happily spewing the same vile rethoric as before and proud to, instead of being shamed into silence.