• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      5 days ago

      And they would respond “You are excused, with our thanks”.

      Don’t get creative. The only correct answer is “no”.

      • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        I had half a day to think about it when they were selecting jury for a DUI case. I’d rather speak my mind freely for the jurors they’ve already selected, who are present during the full selection process. Normally one might think context doesn’t matter but DUI laws can also apply to a bicycle, which is a perfect candidate for being nullified by the jury.

          • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yeah but I also didn’t really want to be on the jury that much. And I didn’t get called up anyway.

              • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                My approach also plants the seed of reason in the jurors who have already been selected. They may ignore jury nullification, but an open discussion of whether or not just laws need to be enforced never hurts.