“To the Feds, I’ll keep this short, because I do respect what you do for our country. To save you a lengthy investigation, I state plainly that I wasn’t working with anyone. This was fairly trivial: some elementary social engineering, basic CAD, a lot of patience. The spiral notebook, if present, has some straggling notes and To Do lists that illuminate the gist of it. My tech is pretty locked down because I work in engineering so probably not much info there. I do apologize for any strife of traumas but it had to be done. Frankly, these parasites simply had it coming. A reminder: the US has the #1 most expensive healthcare system in the world, yet we rank roughly #42 in life expectancy. United is the [indecipherable] largest company in the US by market cap, behind only Apple, Google, Walmart. It has grown and grown, but as our life expectancy? No the reality is, these [indecipherable] have simply gotten too powerful, and they continue to abuse our country for immense profit because the American public has allwed them to get away with it. Obviously the problem is more complex, but I do not have space, and frankly I do not pretend to be the most qualified person to lay out the full argument. But many have illuminated the corruption and greed (e.g.: Rosenthal, Moore), decades ago and the problems simply remain. It is not an issue of awareness at this point, but clearly power games at play. Evidently I am the first to face it with such brutal honesty.”

Post got removed in .world for not being a “news source” even though Klippenstein is definitely a very established independent journalist, so trying again here I guess.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Different communities have different rules, what applies to News may not apply somewhere else.

    • LukeS26 (He/They)@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I get that, but I’m saying on lemmy.world/c/news there is a post by a moderator of another news community on your instance which is from a substack blog (another independent journalist, so I actually like the article being posted, I’m just mentioning it as an example). Obviously the rules differ between communities, but if a very similar community is fine with something, and so is the mod, and so are your mod team since you left it up for almost a day by now, then it seems odd to have that rule at all. And like I mentioned earlier, there is also a post from Ken Klippenstein’s substack that was posted a day ago now, and that one was also fine. I get that moderators can miss things, but this wasn’t a small post, and given it was on a subject you guys have been extremely aggressive (to put it lightly) in moderating, it seems likely that you guys saw it and made a decision that it was fine.

      Like I said, I get why random blogs are banned, the point of a news community should be posting factual information from reliable sources. But you need to check each source anyway, at least the first time you see a specific URL, and since this substack page is only by Klippenstein, and has a very recognizable url, it shouldn’t be any more effort to moderate than any other news website. If all substack pages followed the url scheme of blogname.substack.com or something I’d get it more, since then it’s less of an independent page, but that’s not how it works.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        You’re talking to a talking point.

        He knows he’s full of shit and refuses to take responsibility for anything.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Again, News has their own rules separate from Politics and World News.

        Even if Politics and World News allowed Substack, the Klippenstein post would have been removed for it not being politics in one case, and for being internal US news in the other.

        • LukeS26 (He/They)@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          And again, that’s very much not what I’m saying. I’m saying that I posted this article in News. It was removed for being an unreliable source. Despite this, the 2 posts I linked are both from substack, and both posted on News. Not another similar community, but lemmy.world/c/news. One of those posts is from Ken Klippenstein, same as this one, and was posted to his substack blog. It’s on a topic you guys have been very heavy handed and aggressive in moderating this past week (not to start an argument about that in this thread, just bringing up the fact that posts and comments about this topic have been under increased scrutiny by the mods). Even so, that post was left up, and this one was removed.

          Given that it seems like the News mod team was fine with these other posts from substack, and that kenklippenstein.com is a very unique URL, the same as any other news org would have, the argument that it’s harder to moderate doesn’t make any sense. The only meaningful difference between this substack page and a regular news website is that one is an independent journalist, and they use substack instead of a custom website design.

          Either way, any independent journalist needs to be checked by the mods when someone posts an article from them, and given that Klippstein is the only source cited in the gizmodo article about this manifesto, clearly he must be considered a reliable source, since the gizmodo article wasn’t removed.

          • borari@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            You’ve got the patience of a saint. jordanlund is obviously purposefully ignoring what you’re saying so that he can argue a completely irrelevant point, because he has no satisfactory answer to your questions.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            I can’t speak to what News does or does not do, I’m not a mod there.

            I have told you why it’s removable under thr rules for Politics and World, both of which have different rules than News.

            That’s the way the communities work.

            • LukeS26 (He/They)@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              I did assume you were a News mod by mistake, so sorry about that.

              My overall point though is just that News seems to be inconsistently applying a rule which isn’t even really specified anywhere, and it would be nice if it was either clarified as a rule that any substack is banned, or not having substack alone as a grounds for removal, so that in the future anyone who posts an article from a reliable source that happens to use substack can’t just have it and any conversations arbitrarily removed.

              • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                He was a News mod, as well as mod of many other .world instances which he now is not, on his profile when I made the original comment that incited this chain of comments.

                I checked before posting, so as to actually make an accurate critique.

                I did not take a screenshot because I did not think that such a thing would be necessary, but apparently this guy is a reddit/discord tier gaslighter.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                That would be something to take up with the News mods, all I can explain is why we don’t allow them in the groups I mod.

                News may have similar opinions or they may have their own ideas. I haven’t talked with them about it.

                • LukeS26 (He/They)@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Yeah I don’t blame you for the specific rules in News, I feel like the main point of disagreement we had was your reasoning for not allowing substack articles doesn’t really make sense to me. But regardless, we were definitely speaking past each other somewhat, so sorry about that.

                  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    It’s all good. My personal beef with Substack is that literally anyone can do one. I have better things to do with my time than personally vet each and every Substack blog, keep a list of who’s been naughty and who’s been nice and share that with all the other mods. That’s why we just go “Yeah, Substack? No.” Same if it were Medium, or Blogger, or X or Youtube or Reddit.

                    If it’s a real news story, there will be (eventually) a real news article to link to, as happened here.

                    Let’s say RFK Jr. sets up a Substack about how vaccines are all causing brain damage. That would be removed as well, we don’t even have to bother debunking it, just being on a source that has no vetting is enough.