• LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Opinion piece, folks. The NYT is a boot licking rag but opinion pieces are the opinion of the individual writer, sometimes someone not even associated with the paper. I’ve seen wild shit go up there that they’d never agree with.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Opinion pieces are chosen by the editors. They don’t allow any opinions they don’t want to make print.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Exactly. For example, they have a policy of not allowing trans writers to write opinion pieces on trans issues, as they consider the people most knowledgeable about trans issues to be “biased.”

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Yes. They put it up because everyone is reading it and seething and sharing it and talking about it.

        Are you not familiar with how media operates? It’s often a cynical business reflecting only one thing: they like money.

    • sudo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Brett Stevens is a permanent opinion piece writer at the NYT. This isn’t directly from the editorial board but it is a person they hired directly.

      He is their “pet conservative” though so he’s a professional moron.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Reading about this guy, he sounds like a moron known for saying contrarian bullshit and holding the exact opposite beliefs of what a normal intelligent human would have. And he’s rewarded for it.

    Edit: nevermind, born rich, established rich kid connections, etc. Nothing to see here.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The first step to writing an article like this is to bend your spine backwards until your head is inside your asshole.

  • Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    It’s a Bret Stephens opinion piece. He’s the token conservative of the column. He is literally 1 out of 18 other columnists. He doesn’t even remotely represent The Times as a whole. This declaration is almost as dumb as Bret…almost.

  • Poxlox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 days ago

    The author, Bret Stephens, inherited his fortune from a chemical company his parents built. Just for context as to why he defends a sleezy multi-millionaire

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    Angry rich kids jacked up on radical, nihilistic philosophies can cause a lot of harm, not least to the working-class folks whose interests they pretend to champion.

    Or angry, greedy rich people jacked up on conservatism.

    I was hoping it was going to be a satire OpEd, but nope. Mangione is just a disaffected radical rich kid he compares to Bin Laden and other terrorists who came from well-off families. The writer stops at Thompson’s early normal life and completely disregards the health insurance industry’s problems, which Thompson’s company was a major contributor, claims people are mostly happy with their insurance while the study has no “would you prefer to pay less and get the same service for single-payer care” option. It’s basically “do you like your expensive care you have little/no choice about?”

    Dude wrote an anti-populist article to be inflammatory and told people to shut up because they like their insurance overlords.

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      told people to shut up because they like their insurance overlords.

      Idiots keep answering these surveys like bootlickers than wonder why owners change nothing.

      So they are able to use sample 20k to justify police for 300m people.

      If you ever answer surveys like these, don’t be a dumb ass. This is a class war, act like it.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        When the only questions to surveys are:

        Do you prefer:

        1. A horse kick to the nuts

        2. Stabbed in the eye with a hot poker

        You can say: 72% of people prefer being kicked in the nuts by a horse.

        There is no “I’d rather have chicken” option.

        So a few answering or not will make no difference when the options are restricted to funneling the answer they want to the top.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I remember there used to be an internet joke site that included “the most accurate web poll ever” in which a significant majority votes that they wanted a car that burst into flames when you signal left more than anything in the world. In second place was a goiter.

          When you click the link to take the poll, those were easily the best presented options as answers to the question “What do you want most in the world?”

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 days ago

    Right now they have an article for the case against vigilantism. Fucking hell qualified immunity is state based vigilantism.