At what cost?
Fargo S5 was disappointing.
My surplus labor value at my first job, my second job, a few jobs in between and my current job.
Georgia
Was it officer down?
I find np a worse message when taken literally. If I even have to write an email, it’s at least a little problem. yw allows for a problem you solved for somebody without suggesting that it doesn’t come at the expense of other priorities. Both will be interpreted the same way by almost everyone, of course.
You have an extra “a” in your URL – it’s https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2024/04/11/chinas-state-is-eating-the-private-property-market
You’re welcome to ask things like that of me. This is within the realm of stuff I will gladly do for you.
“Locally made” makes it sounds like they’re bringing them home from the farmer’s market in a canvas bag.
Stay hydrated, death to Israel.
Feel free to spit on the current state of transit; it’s shit in so many places and there’s no pretending otherwise. It’s important to stress that the transit will be unrecognizable from current state if properly funded. If people think I’m talking about them ditching their cars, getting on the existing transit and watching their trip times go up 292%, they’d be right to dismiss me.
Fine, two. Two-lane, no parking roads are still only a third of the size of four-lane roads with parking on both sides.
What happens more often where you live – ambulances reach capacity or somebody gets run over and dies?
The roads are huge because of multiple lanes in two directions with street parking on the side. An ambulance only needs one lane.
Nobody’s proposing banning ambulances. You should be able to take the metro to the club. You should also be able to take it outside of the city and you can figure out the remainder of your journey from there. Reclaiming land from cars would also allow more space within cities for parks and such and decrease the need to get out of the city to escape dickheads leaning on their horns.
I think there’s a lot of reflexive red/blue thinking involved. If your state’s red, your state laws are written by team red, but the national laws by red and blue, going back and forth every few years. Wouldn’t you want all red laws? If it’s just your state, that’s what you get, so you win! Blue followed the same thought process, of course. Swing states have relatively low numbers because they’d just trade purple for purple. The numbers not taking a huge dip in the states that would be enclaves if they went through with this indicates that team Yes didn’t think through the decision.