“But for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the presidency, the office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial,” the report said.
“But for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the presidency, the office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial,” the report said.
So you didn’t remember anything. At least you’re admitting it.
Oh, did Garland appoint Smith on January 21st, 2020, and I missed it?
So, was Smith appointed BEFORE then, and I missed it?