• direwolf@lemmy.mlBanned from communityOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Most people want food, healthcare, education, and housing but not to the extent of the left. It would require very high taxes to pay for them. A high minimum wage doesn’t work. . California passed a $20.00/hr. minimum wage law for fast food workers. The result was that employers hired less workers.

    • orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      OK, smart guy, how do you propose we pay for these things if not with taxes. Right now, our taxes go to wars we don’t believe in. The Pentagon has failed its audits for years, misplacing billions and there’s no accountability. Politicians get to take advantage of gold standard Healthcare, but deny us a public option.

      We subsidize bullshit, our cost of living goes up, our wages stay stagnant, our food becomes more expensive, and affluent white dickheads in charge stay in charge.

      You propose keeping things the same, or at least you believe that’s what people want. We’ve been getting fleeced for years. Should we just hold out a little longer?

      The only people who speak like you are comfortable. You’re the minority.

      • direwolf@lemmy.mlBanned from communityOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Taxes are necessary but if they are too high it lessens the motivation to work. The purpose of working hard is to make money not give it away. If Russia conquers Ukraine, it will lead to more defense spending as the threat from Russia would increase. Giving the Sudetenland to Hitler didn’t appease him.

        • Jorge@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          False. China has lower inequality and simultaneously far greater economic growth and more innovation.

          And Putin is bad, but not remotely as harmful to world peace as the US regime. The US (both parties) has been involved in literally 200 military interventions just in the last few decades.

          Democracy is not when a black woman is chosen as the Nurembeg-deserving war criminal in chief.

          • direwolf@lemmy.mlBanned from communityOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Military intervention does not mean harming world peace. Examples, World War I and II and Korean War.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              World War I was a war between Imperialist countries, World War II was won by the Soviets (who were responsible for 90% of Nazi deaths), and the Korean “War” was an act of genocide from the United States against the Korean people, both to the north and south of the 38th parallel. The United States was in World War I as a creditor, which partially led to World War II as all of the allied powers shifted their debts to Germany, aiding in the rise of Nazism.