• yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The problem with the concept of “war crimes” is it implies honorable warfare exists.

    Why don’t the Russians asphyxiate people the ethical way: with white phosphorus? Are they stupid?

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      White phosphorus doesn’t result in asphyxiation. It does burn, which is the reason it’s mostly used in flares. But, when used as an incendiary, it’s quite bad.

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        white phosphorus can cause asphyxiation in enclosed places like bunkers and tunnels in two different ways. By consuming all the oxygen, or by inhalation of the smoke it gives off.

        The smoke given off by WF is mostly Phosphorus pentoxide. It causes severe irritation and burns to eyes and the respiratory tract.

        Using WF off-label as a tear gas dates back to 1916.

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Even Hitler and Stalin didn’t use chemical warfare because they knew the repercussions. But Putin is just too far gone at this point to see any reason.