“We have a technical debt that stretches back many decades.”

  • squeakycat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s a measure of success to me. Systems that have run for so long and continue to run effectively are to be commended, not ridiculed.

    The article quotes the agency as mentioning the floppies not being the biggest worry. I wish it went into more detail of what shortcomings the current system has and what improvements such a shift to more modern infra would bring.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There aren’t even decent broadband options in Silicon Valley. None of the “innovations” actually make it out of the plush offices into the community.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sonic is offered around the bay area and silicon valley. It’s fantastic. I sadly don’t have it in my current place, but previously had their gigabit fiber — symmetric, uncapped, reliable, and north of 900Mbps on iperf (fast.com would claim 1.0Gbps).

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m 20 minutes away from multiple population centers, in Bay area California, and on a good night I get 4 mB/s download. We need public energy and data ASAP, private oligarchs are fucking us over so hard.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I like the part of the quote you omitted:

    We have to maintain programmers who are experts in the programming languages of the '90s in order to keep running our current system, so we have a technical debt that stretches back many decades,” Tumlin told San Francisco’s KQED in February 2023.

    They say that as if most of the most popular languages in the '90s aren’t still in common use today. I guess what he really means is that they managed to pick something that was obscure proprietary garbage even back then, and should’ve known better.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Or you could just virtualize the machine in an emulator and run it from disk images. 🤷‍♂️

      • Pistcow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        CDs were released in 1982 and pretty damn stable. One year after 3.5 floppys…6 years after 5.25 floppys.

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          ISO 9660 wasn’t around until '88, and even then, its read-only capability paired with high costs wouldn’t make it viable until maybe a decade later … ironically, around the time the system was deployed.

          • Pistcow@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I mean 1989 was the last time I used a 5.25 in elementary before everything was switched to 3.5 with the IBM Model 30.

            • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I know I was still using 5¼" floppies at least a bit into the early '90s, though it’s been long enough that exact years elude me.

              I was also still developing technology that used 3½" diskettes well into the first decade of the new millennium - though I finally managed to migrate newer systems to CD-R around the end of that decade.