• Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I think because of

    1.the chasm between the intended discourse of the film (feelgood movie with puppies going on adventures) and the alleged means to film it, feels particularly cynical and dishonest

    2.the fact that dogs are companions -they have co-evolved next to humans for about 15 thousand years and hold a special place, contrary to animals typically consumed for their flesh

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thanks for the thoughtful response! 1) makes a lot of sense, and 2) makes a lot of “emotional sense” to me (as opposed to “intellectual sense,” I guess).

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        yea, it’s still not super reasonable to murder animals when we could, well, not do it. But I think dogs being companions mostly explains the difference in treatment. I used to be a vegan but the emotional load was too heavy to bear everyday. I chose to look away. I’m not proud, but I can’t afford to be shameful. Do you eat animals ?

        • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          No, I’ve been a strict vegetarian for a long time, mostly vegan now but not strict about it. I did eat fish a few years ago because it was an invasive species (and also, delicious).

          But also, I have no problem getting the food/nutrients I need from a plant based diet, which isn’t always easy for other folks.