• Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    And then there are companies that take good designs and engineering, and quietly scuttle them to be replaced with something far crappier. Why? To sell more of course. I’m looking at you, Whirlpool.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not sure you can say the Playstation controller was “impossible to improve”:

    1995:

    1997: (Dual Analog, no rumble)

    1997: (Dualshock):

    2000: (Dualshock 2):

    2006: (SIXAXIS - Sony lost a rumble lawsuit and removed rumble as a feature):

    2007: (Dualshock 3 - Rumble lawsuit settled):

    2013: (Dualshock 4):

    2020: (Dualsense)

    2023: (Dualsense Edge):

  • El Barto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Impossible is hiperbole.

    The paperclip can definitely be improved. It’s just that the way it is now is good enough, and the improvements aren’t probably not worth it.

    Edit: Also, I don’t think I agree with some of his points. The design has to be ubiquitous? Why?! I can build one thing, never sell it or distribute it, and try to improve it until I can’t improve it anymore.

    And he mentioned that the Sunbeam toaster could not be the de facto design today because back then it was expensive. Yeah, you know what was also expensive at the beginning? Hard drives. He ignores that manufacturing improvements make building things cheaper.

    And a couple of more things. I decided to stop watching after a few minutes.