• Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      6 months ago

      Man ass is verifiably less offensive to religious types than any part of a woman being visible.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’d churn my own butter at the sight of a woman’s bare ankle bone. Best to just punish women for that. It’s impossible to control my own urges.

        • daltotron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’d churn my own butter

          vile, never heard it said this way before, I’m stealing this for personal use

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          Because Catholicism.

          Catholics believe that any sexual activity that doesn’t have a chance of making a baby is sinful. Gays obviously can’t make babies as a normal part of their love making, so that’s where the whole ‘being gay is sinful’ bit comes from

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Because they find gay sex unappealing, seems to be the main reason. If you point out that that is simply because they’re not gay, they are unable to understand the point.

        • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s the enjoying part that is frowned upon. They assume everyone loves seeing boobs so they must be punished for that. A bare man ass is comical at best for most. If they thought people were enjoying it they must be punished