• Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The guy might be a nutjob but I don’t think he’s talking about getting them back through war, Argentina has next to no military.

    Having colonies in the year 2023 is ridiculous though, I don’t know why so many comments act like Britain is in the right here in any way whatsoever.

    • BenadrylChunderHatch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you think the Falklands should be part of Argentina, logically Hawaii should be part of Kiribati. Alaska should be Russian/Canadian, etc etc. If you think about it for more than a minute it becomes clear that geographical location is not the only factor or even the most important one.

        • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even if your bullshit wasn’t bullshit, theres another huge difference you are ignoring - the US is capable of doing something about it, Argentina is not.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            the US is capable of doing something about it, Argentina is not.

            Well, they did try, and failed, but it was costly for both sides, so it wasn’t a hard one-sided affair.

            Besides, that’s not the point I’m trying to make, and not relevant to this discussion. The point of legal ownership by “first rights”, and not “might makes right”, is what I’m speaking towards.

            • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Cool, so since Britain has held the islands longer than Argentina has existed you consider the matter settled?

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Cool, so since Britain has held the islands longer than Argentina has existed you consider the matter settled?

                No. Think Argentina has the strongest claim based on previous ownership from Spain, and being the nearest nation to the islands.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Since when were the Falklands an example of colonialism? Nobody lived there until the Europeans showed up.

      • anonono@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        [insert obama awarding obama meme here]

        I mean the UK won’t return Gilbraltar to Spain who were in the EU with them they won’t obviously return the falklands.

        I’d like to see the UK also defending the “vote of the people” if Ireland voted to leave the UK

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          return the falklands.

          To who, the French?! They’re the only ones who settled there before the British (beating them by a whopping 1 year), and they left again two years after they showed up. (And I say “settled there,” by the way, because if we went by who discovered it then the only people the British could return it to would be themselves.)