• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    That number seems really low…and also not news. I’m 40 years old, and never met anyone who WASN’T living paycheck to paycheck.

    • School_Lunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I don’t get out much, so I have no clue how others are doing. I’ll admit that shit sucks right now, but I haven’t been living paycheck to paycheck since working part time in my early 20s over a decade ago. I live in a low COL area and make about $35-$40,000 a year. I only spend maybe $15,000 a year. I may never be able to buy a house, but I’m far off from paycheck to paycheck. It makes me wonder if people who are living that way are maybe just living outside of their means?

      • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        It makes me wonder if people who are living that way are maybe just living outside of their means?

        Could also be a large percentage of people have significant student loans and/or medical debt.

      • Jimbo@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        In New Zealand there is no such thing as a low COL area, and where there is, it is a small village in the middle of nowhere that has literally no job openings available.

    • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Dual income, no kids. Not living paycheck to paycheck.

      But yeah, all of our friends are single and living paycheck to paycheck.