• Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Congressional districts should have a perimiter-area ratio limit, and the largest district should not be allowed to contain 10% more people than the smallest district.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I like that and it would probably work better than suing over a gerrymandered map only for the courts to uphold the crazy district, exactly what happened with the Texas 2nd Congressional District map.

          Honestly with our current level of technology, a more direct democracy approach like a popular vote representation based on stance alignment would probably work better. For example, Average Joe would optionally select a party and then vote on policies, and the representatives would have selected their policies to align with constituents. Policies and candidates on ballot would be chosen through a regular primary, so each party might have separate policies on the ballot. Independents could select a mix of each and get automatically assigned a politician.

          I bet the GOP wouldn’t even oppose it because they love forcing people to commit to a party.