• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t really like Kamala Harris much, but I really doubt she’d be substantially worse than Biden. And probably miles better than virtually any Republican.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                They lose enough people moving to blue states that they keep taking more from the feds than they pay in and the status quo stays the same.

                Except they further cement their states as red states. Each of which has 2 senators who are less likely to flip. The status quo gets worse.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            let the states work on progressive policy like protecting trans, queer, etc, access to birth control, abortions, etc.

            That’s a great way to make those into Red State Problems that will never be fixed for the whole country, because legislators from blue states represent people for whom the problems are solved and experience no pressure to address the problems beyond that.

        • rayyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I didn’t expect lollypops and ice cream when Biden was elected but if you really look at his accomplishments, he is doing a really good job. Certainly the MSM isn’t reporting it so you have to dig to find it, and it’s there.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I disagree that Biden is doing a really good job. I think he is not doing enough to combat climate change, labor rights, income inequality, or human rights abuses at every level of government. His foreign policy is status quo, which isn’t good.

            He’s a functioning adult with a modicum of shame, which is to say he’s worlds better than any Republican, especially Trump. He’s doing his job and making thoughtful, considered decisions. In comparison to the previous administration, that’s a grand slam, but compared to the leadership we need right now, it’s not good enough.

              • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Leadership means setting the goal and making the persuasive argument. It means speaking out on issues when Congress and activist judges are pushing in the wrong direction. Governing is the slow boring of hard boards, and if you give up without trying because some people will try to stop you, then you have no business running for office.

                • groupofcrows@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  So Biden compromises to make a deal with Republicans, they backtrack so it’s Biden’s fault nothing gets done?

                  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    In each of his speeches announcing his comprehensive plans for combatting climate change, income inequality, the housing crisis, and the Palestinian genoncide.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If Harris becomes president and chooses to run for a second term, there’s a good chance we’re losing 2028. She lacks charisma and often comes off as unprepared even for softball questions, and her history does… not endear her to large parts of the Dem electorate.

          Best hope for a non-dictator running on the GOP ticket.

          Hell, maybe I’ll be proven wrong, and she’ll turn out great in the position. But I’m not exactly thrilled by her performance so far.

            • Patches@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Then rounded over to Donald v Kamala in 2032. then AITrump v Kamala in 2036. Just keep holding your nose and vote the way you’re told to or the whole system collapses.

              • OpenStars@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Tbf, we probably had AI Trump already for parts of the last presidency. We do as we’re told, the same as the President of the United States!

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            She lacks charisma and often comes off as unprepared even for softball questions, and her history does… not endear her to large parts of the Dem electorate.

            And that’s before we even get to the problems associated with being the preordained candidate on the 20th anniversary of the last time the results of the Democratic Party primaries weren’t decided ahead of time.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m not gonna say it would be wrong to happen that way, but I do feel like it would be a disservice to civil rights for the first woman president to be a matter of technicality, deigned to be given by an old white man. It would always be a bit marred by that.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The thing is if Biden really did that, she would be able to run 2 more terms as president. I think Lyndon had that chance but didn’t get reelected for a 2nd term. Outside of Roosevelt, she would have the chance to serve longer than 2 years as president.

    • FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s one of the biggest jobs of being vice president

      That’s one of the only jobs of being VP. Be ready in case your boss dies, and cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate. The position serves no other purpose. Just ask the first guy who took the job:

      My country has in its wisdom contrived for me the most insignificant office that ever the invention of man contrived or his imagination conceived

      – John Adams