• Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    173
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Gotta love the use of quotes here:

    it should be treated with “utmost importance.”

    In other words, ignore this message from our lawyers.

  • Elise@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If the uni has a license what’s the issue lol

    Also kinda shitty of those companies to charge educational instutions

    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not only shitty, it’s dumb. Even Adobe knows to give students hefty discounts. It’s how they get new users on the hook.

      • abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve been using Jetbrains products for free in college and I can say that it is the best advertisement. I bought it the day after my student license expired.

      • Elise@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ehh even when I was in school I used foss like blender and gimp. I’ve never had an actual copy of 3dsmax, Maya or photosoup. Been plenty productive with that my entire life.

          • Elise@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Yeah, that’s really unfortunate. I think the market would be way more dynamic innovative, and secure if such large packages would be foss. Larger companies can have their own full or part time specialists, and smaller ones can put out bounties etc

    • khaleer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 months ago

      On my uni we also had licenses, their ratio per students were somethibg like 1:10.

    • zelnix@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      The uni doesnt care. The software vendor does and is threatening the uni for not being compliant.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Also kinda shitty of those companies to charge educational instutions

      It really is, but what can do? Capitalism exploits everything for profit.

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Some software uses license servers where each client is supposed to request a seat temporarily. If more people use it at once than seats were licenses they detect that with phone home features. We had that with Matlab I believe, if you tried using it in the most popular time you might not be able to.

  • verznogod@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    As a french, please don’t give a penny worth of licence to Dassault Systèmes. They were founded by some of the worst ennemy of the people my country made.

      • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I am not French, but tried to look it up. I couldn’t find anything except him being a billionaire which should be enough.

      • verznogod@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sorry to answer a little late,

        Dassault is a group which covers multiple company, the most notorious is “Dassault Aviation” which sells warplanes like the “Rafale”. But it is also implicated in a lot of other activities like infrastructures and road work, press, informatics, etc. The company is very close to the government because it need public contracts to work, it can’t sell planes without it being a contract between France and the country who buys it. Which is very problematic because Dassault has interest in influencing exterior politics of my country to sell it’s planes. The head of Dassault company in the last few decades is Serge Dassault, Billionaire and French Politician. S. Dassault has used his influence and power as a media owner and elected regional politician to promote his business.

        On the politic side he was a right wing politician, leaning to the far right. He made some homophobic statements during the discussion about same-sex marriage stating that homosexuality in ancient Greece was “one of the reasons for its decadence” and that “there is no renewing of the population. We’re going to have a country of Homos. There will be nobody left in 10 years. That’s stupid.” He was also publicly anti-union (which is honestly pretty rare to be claimed publicly in France) and against the right to go on strikes. He said that he admire the Chinese work organization.

        He was brought to the court several times :

        • For concealing during 15 years millions in other countries.
        • For rigging elections by buying votes in 2008. His election was canceled and he was sentenced to 1 year of ineligibility. He went around it by making one of his partner, Jean-Pierre Bechter, elected. In 2013, Mediapart (a french independent newspaper of investigation) released an audio of S. Dassault claiming he spent 1,7 million of euros to elect Bechter.

        I am not an expert on this and a lot of what I am saying here is documented on his French wikipedia page about his politics view and his legal problems Much more can be said but it is a beginning to understand what I meant.

        Serge Dasault is now dead but his children are all at different responsibility positions in the Dassault group. Here is a map of who owns the medias in France (last updated in December 2023) where you can see what Dassault owns, it seems to be less than when S. Dassault was still alive, for exemple until 2006 they also owned “L’express” French Medias who owns what?

    • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      I pirated solid works because my university’s engineering program required what we PAY for it to complete our courses that absolutely required it.

    • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      SW was great to use back in uni but holy hell is it full of phone home stuff and really annoying these days, I scrapped my license, they straight up wouldn’t let me cancel within 30 days of renewal so I yanked my cc and “cancelled” that way.

      Use FreeCAD, mentioned in a few posts, it’s got some clunk but it’s 100% useable, has more than enough features for prosumer/hobbyist use, personally I’d make an argument it’s fine for enterprise use too, Ondsel seems to think so considering that’s the market they’re targeting with their releases. I’d recommend the Ondsel release or Realthunder’s (what I currently use) which has features/fixes that will be merged back, and 100% look at mainline freecad when the 1.0 release drops

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      yea I would like to second that. Not sure how many FOSS alternatives exist for mine design & planning though

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Thumb of rule is, If you don’t make enough to comfortably pay for some software; you simply don’t pay for said software.

    • averyminya@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yup, this is why I didn’t pay for REAPER until the check for my first audiobook came through!

      I’m still waiting for that check from the author, but you best believe $60 of it is going to the software that made that job possible!

  • xiao@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    PhD students as well as all students of all levels need to use pirated software to fully develop their abilities.Trash this warning.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Pro tip: Always use a program like binisoft windows firewall control

    Look at companies like this. The software KNOWS it has been cracked but instead of disabling itself it sends home your info so you can get sued for copyright infringement

    Ps: I’m curious to know the price of the geovia suite. I’m guessing it’s a subscription and I’m guessing it’s more than 10k per year

    • Lojcs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or a firewall that doesn’t rely on windows firewall, since programs will just whitelist themselves from it during installation

      • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I didn’t encounter a single program that bypassed the block applied by windows firewall control - after setup they usually don’t have the admin rights anymore to control it

        • Lojcs@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It’s pretty common for programs to add firewall rules for themselves during setup. If you rely on manually blocking them after the fact they could have called back home already

  • gencha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 months ago

    That is some next-level Minecraft you are playing over there

  • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    That reminds me, I got a very threatening email from my college in 2000s about downloading movies and that they traced the IP to my laptop, and I could be paying $10k in fines, have this on my permanent record and/or expelled.

    I loled and pirated a lot more safer.

    Still waiting for them to follow up with that 20 years later.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    We also had expensive engineering software at university. Oftentimes it’s a major PITA for everyone. The PhD students have to get their work done and are met by the software refusing to start because all licenses are taken. Sometimes someone forgot to log off or the computer crashed and the software takes most of the day to recover that license. Or some people do like 5 simulations in parallel. Or lock the computer, go home and block a license. The IT department will get lots of calls and have to deal with it. Especially when the pool of licenses is small. And it takes additinal effort to coordinate practical courses and excercises where you teach a group of 24 people which then need half the license pool available at a fixed time each week, despite the daily routine of everyone else.

    And I’m not even sure if the people responsible, care too much for pirated software. But they’re liable. Of course they write strongly worded mails when talking to everyone. It’s their IT infrastructure and they can’t have people do illegal things with it. Especially not while having an expensive contract with some supplyer. They can’t have anyone leak a mail where they endorse piracy. Or post screenshots or turn in assignments or papers with screenshots that say “unregistered copy” in the bottom corner. And once students do silly things and the piracy is on display publicly, they’ll have to do something. Usually that’s writing a strongly worded email first. Because that takes next to no effort. I think the usual IT department doesn’t care as long as things go smoothly, people do their various things and no one complains. They usually have other stuff to do. That makes me think in this story something must have happened that warranted some form of public reaction or at least show they addressed it and they have it in writing.

    And I think the rest of the mail fits such IT people. They said why they do it and that they can’t have piracy connected to the institutes name. They say they need some incoming complaints to justify buying more licenses. And the punishment fits the crime. They just disconnect the computer from their network and it’s not their problem anymore. I think that’s fair.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    It should be treated with “utmost importance”, not with utmost importance. That ending is quite subversive!

  • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    So thry’re saying they have plenty of licenses for the use case, but somehow people are still pirating?

    Maybe their license management paradigm is just garbage. This could be the vendor, but also poor IT policy if the users can’t requisition what they need.

    As usual, service problem.

    So much licensing fuckery-- dealing with floating or reissuing licenses, users needing to move to different machines-- could be solved via affordable site licensing. But that might leave dollars on the table if users don’t overbuy.