“… The “dirty secret” of the insurance industry is that most denials can be successfully appealed…”

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Usually when signing things off like this, it’s affirming that you believe all statements to be true. They would have to prove you willingly lied, not that you were simply wrong, which is very difficult to prove legally.

      That said, IANAL.

      • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        ‘Reckless disregard for the truth’ shows up sometimes, especially in e.g. defamation.

        If the AI cites some legal case from 2015 or a random medical article, you probably need to ensure that those articles actually exist, and not simply assume that the AI is right.

        If the AI said that a month’s supply of Fentanyl is the recommended treatment for a headache, no reasonable person is going to believe it. That means that if you say that you believe that, the court isn’t going to consider you a reasonable person.

        IANAL either.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What’s the legal code if you THINK something is true and you affirm it, but you are wrong. It can’t be the same as lying since you thought it was true.

      I really wonder what the law says on something like that.