• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That is a tautology, and also cyclic and thus doesn’t address the point that you can not unconsciously give consent.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The end effect of obligations, culture, and circumstances are all just consent - even without your direct permission. If the end result is not different, what is the difference then?

      Again, consent by any other name.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This discussion is going nowhere without a definition to shape it.

        https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/consent

        To express willingness, to give permission.

        It is impossible to give permission or express willingness without knowledge.

        I reject your use of consent in your examples… it would be better expressed as situational realities or obligations of existence rather then mindful permission.

          • Nelots@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You’re ignoring what they’re saying. They know that. They simply disagree with your definition of consent because, well, its not the definition of consent.

          • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Consent comes before the outcome. If the outcome happens without consent, the outcome happens without consent. The word consent has a meaning and it isn’t “something that happened”