chobeat@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoLuigi Mangione, CEO shooting suspect, is a tech workerwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square379fedilinkarrow-up1752arrow-down135cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1717arrow-down1external-linkLuigi Mangione, CEO shooting suspect, is a tech workerwww.bbc.comchobeat@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square379fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squarefrostysauce@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·4 days agoHow much do you think it costs to hire a security detail? I’m pretty sure security for the entire C-suite would be a tiny drop in the bucket for most mega-corporations.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·4 days agoWhether it costs a dollar or a billion dollars, who do you think is going to pay for it?
minus-squareRogue@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoIf they could squeeze out an extra dollar then they would already do so. They don’t need to justify it as “increased security costs”.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoWhen have they ever rased rates without giving a justification? Please show me.
minus-squareRogue@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-23 days ago please show me. Nah, I’m good. Clearly our opinions differ. It’s of no interest to me to collate a bunch of sources just for you to dismiss in bad faith. Feel free to find sources to support your own argument though if you like.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoIn other words, you can’t show me because you can’t back up your claim. Got it.
minus-squareRogue@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoDude, you’re the one asserting that healthcare costs will rise due to increased security requirements. I don’t quite follow why the onus is on me to backup my retort.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoBecause you said they don’t need to justify raising rates. Do I really need to show you that insurance companies give reasons for raising rates?
minus-squareRogue@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoNo, neither of us need to do anything.
How much do you think it costs to hire a security detail? I’m pretty sure security for the entire C-suite would be a tiny drop in the bucket for most mega-corporations.
Whether it costs a dollar or a billion dollars, who do you think is going to pay for it?
If they could squeeze out an extra dollar then they would already do so. They don’t need to justify it as “increased security costs”.
When have they ever rased rates without giving a justification? Please show me.
Nah, I’m good. Clearly our opinions differ. It’s of no interest to me to collate a bunch of sources just for you to dismiss in bad faith.
Feel free to find sources to support your own argument though if you like.
In other words, you can’t show me because you can’t back up your claim. Got it.
Dude, you’re the one asserting that healthcare costs will rise due to increased security requirements.
I don’t quite follow why the onus is on me to backup my retort.
Because you said they don’t need to justify raising rates. Do I really need to show you that insurance companies give reasons for raising rates?
No, neither of us need to do anything.