• albigu@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Besides being a fucking ugly graph where you can barely read the node labels, I also like that this one pretty much admits democrats are clustered along the other reactionaries.

    They also don’t describe how they even got that clustering (or the network itself) in the first place. I think it’s safe to assume they either nicked it from the web or got an inexperienced intern to just do whatever with a Jupyter notebook.

    Is it a network of “common posters”? Of links in sidebar? In cross-posts?

    Data science is what happens when “programmers think they are experts in everything that deals with computers” is taken to its most extreme. This field needs a purge, for the sake of all actual statisticians.

    Science is when you never show your methodology, because it came to you in a dream a linear regression.

    • bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not only is it impossible to read the node labels, it’s even more impossible to tell what is connected to what. At some point you are better off not showing the connections at all. Did an AI visualize this graph?

    • JucheBot1988@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      when “programmers think they are experts in everything that deals with computers”

      The thing is, they usually aren’t even experts in that. Your typical programmer seems to have no idea how computers actually work, and thinks they’re magical self-sufficient machines that will someday be able to run entire economies with no actual production happening.

    • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      They put “anarcho”-capitalism, the meme ideology that has the most incel energy, right next to all the different kinds of feminism. Also, “anarcho”-capitalism os closer to radical feminism than it is to objectivism, the pseudophilosophical drivel that is essentially boils down to being a flavour of "an"caps that are more open about their hatred for the poor. How can anyone take this seriously?