The president of Mexico on Thursday expressed hope that Google “reconsiders” its decision to change its online maps to reflect U.S. President Donald Trump’s claim that he has the authority to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico.

Shortly after taking office, Trump issued an executive order announcing he was changing the name of the body of water to the Gulf of America.

For U.S. users of Google Maps, the gulf was listed as the Gulf of America as of Thursday. Google, whose CEO attended Trump’s inauguration along with other tech moguls, said last month it has “a long-standing practice of applying name changes when they have been updated in official government sources.”

But Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum warned Thursday that her government “will file a civil suit” against Google if it does not revert back to labeling the international body of water the Gulf of Mexico.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 days ago

    I want to know how many of the people here defending Google’s decision would be okay with Google labeling Taiwan as “Taiwan (Chinese Taipei)” for people in Taiwan and also the rest of the world.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Republicans are so good at baiting liberals into useless bullshit arguments, while they plunder stuff that actually matters.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    Google also removed the ability to suggest edits to specifically the Gulf.

    Guess they knew ahead of time they’d get an influx of requests to change or back.

    • Lukas Murch@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      My phone is a Pixel on Google Fi, and I have a YouTube premium account. I’ve got a lot of work ahead of me :( lol

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nah. I’ll start boycotting google when there are useful alternatives. Amazon, facebook, reddit - no problem.

      Google search - fine, I can get by with DDG or Yandex. Gmail - sure, whatever. Maps? Organic Maps (and other openstreetmaps front-ends) works alright for getting your bearings, but it’s a far cry from useful for finding businesses, and terrible for navigation. Waze used to be the only viable alternative, but ever since Google bought them, it’s hard to justify a full boycott without massively inconveniencing myself.

      Same for meta as a whole. Facebook and Instagram, sure, no need. But living without whatsapp is simply impossible in some countries, where it’s the de-facto standard for communication, and even used as the only means of contact with government agencies.

      • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        If you disapprove of internet companies caving to authoritarian politics, I have bad news for you about Yandex

      • TWB0109@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Fr, I try, but it’s really not possible to get away from these companies.

        Nobody wants signal, nobody wants mastodon, nobody wants or frankly can use openstreetmaps. Alternatives are just not good enough

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          Alternatives are just not good enough

          And to no fault of their own of course. They just aren’t working with the same resources as Google and the others.

          I think it’s more a question of stepping down our level of comfort at this point. Can we live without a particular service that Google provides, when there are no alternatives with feature parity? Or can we live with the fact that some of the features aren’t working as well or missing, and use the alternatives anyway?

          • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Exactly. If there were perfectly interchangeable alternatives, there would have been a true competition and those companies wouldn’t be holding the amount of power they do today in the first place.

            Moving to alternatives requires some degree of effort and giving up on some microconforts. There’s no other way. There’s no fight without any pain. If we want to fight those companies, we must sacrifice those micro conforts, even if that means reducing tech use as a whole and doing a few things the “old fashioned” way.

    • AJ1@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      it really sucks when you realise that virtually everything is a US company… and yet everything they sell is made in fucking China

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    or we keep american shit inside america. fuck googlemaps, apple and all other shitty US corporations. see, tump will die some day and be forgotten, but people will remember what apple and google did. next time you see someone work for alphabet…spit them in the face. next time an american buys a burger, you spit on it. etc. it is not about actual harm as america is killing itself anyway atm. my bingo card says if trump wins twice, there shall also be two pandemics. maybe protest the egg prices a bit more before using that muri-brain to do sth. against it. americans are just stupid.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s a US company following US policy as it’s a contract holder for the US Government they’re compelled to follow US policy. Whether anyone likes it or not, at least for right now, US policy is that the Gulf of Mexico for all intents and purposes is the Gulf of America.

    President Sheinbaum can sue Google all she wants, but there’s no court that’s going to find that a US company complying with US policy is breaking the law.

  • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    But it kinda makes sense to be called Gulf of America since it’s located in North America.

  • keropoktasen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Well, the continent was named America, not the Mexico continent. So the name Gulf of America just sounds right. It’s not like the name changed to the Gulf of US.

  • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    President of mexico is just showing themselves to be as big of a baby as trump. Best thing to do is ignore it. Its of such little importance.

  • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    225
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Why bother with this? If you want to make a point, pass regulation in Mexico to call E.E.U.U. (US in Mexico) be called Northern Mexico. Then Google is forced to comply on that territory like they claim they do for disputed sections when maps are viewed from that region. It would make for some funny reactions from people visiting Cancun or Puerto Vallarta.

    Edit: plus it would show how stupid the whole rename thing is to begin with.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      184
      ·
      8 days ago

      TIL…

      The abbreviation E.E.U.U. (often written as EE. UU.) stands for Estados Unidos (United States) in Spanish. This abbreviation follows a grammatical rule in Spanish where doubling the initial letters of each word indicates plurality

      So you taught me something today I did not know. Thank you!!

      • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        See, I learned this in Spanish class in my American high school, and I don’t think that linguistic fact stuck with me! Thanks

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 days ago

        Interestingly (or not) it’s also used in French but only in one case that I’m aware of. Monsieur is abbreviated to M. while messieurs (plural) is MM.

      • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Just let our mexican and Canadian neighbors take over the USA. We’ve proven to be unworthy of making wise choices.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Wait what do they call the European Union then because that’s still EU in Spanish as well.

        • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s UE in Spanish, from Unión Europea. (Non-doubled letters because it’s a single Union, there’s no plural like in “States”).

          Sometimes people in Spain do use the English acronyms for both EU/USA, but I don’t think I’ve seen it often. Both UE and EEUU are more common from what I’ve seen, and also people rarely say these out loud, it’s exclusively a written language problem.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      If we’re going to play that demagogic game, why not make “United States of America” be shown as “United States of North America” to reclaim the continent name back? Companies will comply if it’s an official request.

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Currently in Mexico, it displays the name your phone region is set to. It still shows Gulf of America on my phone, even when I am on Mexican WiFi.

    • 13roses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Google is one of many propaganda arms of the US govt. I highly doubt they’d comply with that as it doesn’t fit in with their political agenda.

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      It looks like they’re giving the lawyers time to find legal arguments to file.

      Though they could jusr ban Google from their country.

  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Everyone needs to get used to ignoring this bullshit. The Gulf of America thing isn’t important. It doesn’t effect anyone, and there’s far too many posts about it when there are real things to pay attention to. This is purely a distraction. Stop giving it attention.

    • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nah it actually matters more than you think. As an American you might think this is okay, but its not. And Trump getting away with whatever he wants all the time is because of enabling

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        For sure. It’s just that this isn’t the part that matter. This is part of the enabling. If you’re paying attention here you don’t see the other thing over there. It’s slight of hand. You only have so much attention, and it’s better spent where it actually has an effect. This will be reversed with the next president.

    • archchan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s the details that make up the whole picture.

      As an isolated situation, the renaming thing may be stupid and not worth giving any credence. Energy can be spent resisting elsewhere in more useful places. However along with the rest of the actions of billionare corpos that kissed the ring, it’s part of the overall trend with devastating consequences. Bullshit details shouldn’t be ignored, but acknowledged as “they’re fucking us from all directions right now and waging war on reality, and we really should stop letting them”.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s definitely a distraction tactic, but at the very least looking at Google Maps and Bing Maps makes very clear to people which megacorps are riding the oligarchy; just in case anyone held hope their favorite “techbro revolutionary” might side with them. PS: Mapquest gets it right.