• randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I can believe that Trump won on the backs of “people voting only for Trump and no one else on the ballot”, since Trump was running far ahead of all the other republican candidates. Means once Trump dies of old age, there will be a power vacuum. Remember, democrats have run two women and Biden in the decade span that republicans have only ran Trump.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      They didn’t show up because they spent four years under Trump and four years under Biden, and all they got for the effort of voting in those elections was being significantly poorer, so why forego a day’s pay?

      You’re the self-righteous dipshit for not caring about the quality of people you vote for.

      • a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Who would have thought giving trillions in Tax refunds to billionaires would result in the rest of the population being worse off?!??? And the nerve of Biden using policy to stop the runaway inflation Trump caused! Don’t worry, those people are all about to find out what real pain is when the cost of things start reflecting trumps proposed tariffs…

      • takeheart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        So I just checked, but couldn’t find any data yet for 2024. The US Census Bureau has data online up to 2022, same for Statista. Judging from the past releases it would take a year or so for the information to be compiled and released. Looks like we’ll have to wait.

    • Fosheze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      No. Why would they? Even if everyone voted (which isn’t even remotely close to being true) populations also change.

    • BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      In all the swing states they were less than the difference between the two parties.

      Eessentially Democrats last i checked and calculated on Friday lost 4 swing states that would change the outcome by around 250k votes.

    • Aaron@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The others are saying no one cares or they don’t matter, but they do if that’s where those “missing” votes went

      • Ebber@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        According to Wikipedia data, it’s a decrease of 0.3 percentage points from 1.9% in 2020 to 1.6% of votes that didn’t go democrat or republican.

        Though 5% of the votes are still not reported, so that might change still.

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Ummm we still have like 5 million votes to count in california alone, stop posting incomplete statistics as if they are comparable to previous years full statistics

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Ummm the votes aren’t counted but they have been received and accepted, which means the voters’ names and parties are known. We were getting numbers of voters by party for weeks before election day as mail-in ballots were received. But you’re getting a lot of upvotes so clearly you must be right anyway.

        • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Again, this isn’t vote counts it’s votes by party. We were getting these counts before election day as ballots were received, because they are validated upon receipt, thus identifying the voter and their party before counting who they voted for.

        • Donkter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I get what your saying and I agree, but it’s funny/sad that you could add all 5 million of those votes to the Dems and the graphic would still be making the same point.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    “When someone shows you who they are, believe them…”

    They’ve told you with the “eating the dogs” comments and hundreds of other examples… They aren’t afraid to confidently lie to win…

    They’ve told you they believe they are in a way that they would die and kill to win…

    Remember, years of false, unsubstantiated outrage is meant to dilute challenge to actual crimes and horror. Some things to think about…

    We can have measured confirmation, without conspiracy. We will review this election and make evidence-based arguments.

    The richest man in the world owns thousands of SW engineers that remain in his companies (after all with any morality have been purged through years of labor abuse). He joked with carlson about how he was completely fucked if trump didn’t win. What do you think the richest man in the world is capable of in that moment?

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    People need motivation to vote. A selective tax credit or “other guy bad” simply isn’t enough. You can complain all you want about how stupid people are for not voting against fascism, but if you cannot face the reality of voters and how to get them to vote then how much smarter can you really call yourself over others? This is a lesson that apparently needs to be learned every election yet never seems to be learned.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Truly spoken.

      Lot of pro-status-quo sentiment on Lemmy. The election is over too so bots might not be as high, a potential indicator of actual sentiment of Lemmings.

      Have to keep pushing this else nothing ever changes

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Progressive issues poll astronomically high across dems, repubs, and independents. Find one. Say you will do it, and people will come vote for it.

    • Xatolos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The problem also is that there was quite a bit of voter intimidation of people with Trump flags heavily armed in some places “to make sure it’s a fair election”, Trump supporters choosing violence, and other issues like ballot boxes being burned, and ballots not coming to people preventing them from voting.

      This could help explain why 10 million less votes happened this year for the Democrats because they could have been fearful of voting or just unable.

      (And this also doesn’t include mailing ballots just being refused to be counted over simple issues as signatures not looking close enough to what’s on file.)

    • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      One of my team members is based in the US, and he told me after the election: “The media told us all about how bad Trump was. But nobody ever told us how good Kamala was.” I guess voting only for the lesser evil has its limits.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Honestly not even Kamala said how good she was, most of what she was asked she immediately turned into “Trump bad”.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Honestly a lot of the questions in interviews were she did that, she was given a tough question that had the easy out of taking the more progressive stance but instead of giving a firm answer she’d attack Trump, presumably because she didn’t want to be too “radical” in supporting policies that voters generally like

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Oh, the Republicans will give them a reason to vote, just wait a bit and see, lol. If Republicans deregulating banks caused a “great recession”, I’m very curious what voters just bought for us by voting for a platform of deregulating everything.

      No, I think people will enjoy the taste of curb and a swift kick to the head for the next 4-8 years. It really puts things in perspective.

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        And that’ll work exactly once, just like it did in 2020. Then after four more years of compromising with fascism, it won’t work again, and they’ll lose to the greater evil.

        Just kidding, we’re not going to have real elections again.

        • babybus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Just kidding, we’re not going to have real elections again.

          Absolutely. One Russian opposition politician described Putin’s first term by saying: “We thought we could get rid of him in the next elections.” But that didn’t happen as we know. When someone comes to power and quickly removes checks and balances, it becomes very difficult to reverse that. Democracy is not guaranteed, even in the US.

  • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    How did 10 million fewer Democrat voters, only +500k to Republicans, but have basically the same high voter turnout?

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Dems unmistakeably snatched defeat from the jaws of victory, but it beggars belief that all the indictments and treason didn’t undermine Trump’s popularity any. The right-wing media machine must be one of the most effective brainwashing apparatuses ever to exist.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      You can call it brainwashing or whatever you like.

      To me, the fact that Trump’s indictments came as a result of enormous attention by his political rivals, during an election, gives me less respect for the implications in terms of his character.

      Like, the timing is a little suspect on these legal indictments.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        What’s your stance on the about with Hilary before and during the election up to and including Trump pressing for investigation and moreso to “lock her up”.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      They have perfected targeted misinformation. you should see how many fake accounts there are even in local Facebook groups. It’s crazy.

    • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Isn’t it already known that the trump fans are zealots for him. The fact that people are shocked that they’ll turn out for him regardless of what he does surprises me. He practically said this in 2016 with his I could shoot somebody quote and he’s been proven right. The only way you beat trump is by having people turn out to vote against him and to do that you need to run an inspiring campaign.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      They didn’t vote “for him” so he didn’t matter, they voted instead against trans athletes and forced child trans surgeries and whatever other manufactured conspiracy theories were peddled confidently.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s more about the puberty blockers than surgery. That’s the focus from my media sources.

        Are they doing surgeries on kids too?

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh you know how it is - they throw just a ton of stuff out there in order to see what will stick. Yeah puberty blockers are among them - and ngl that is kinda messed up if a doctor is trying to push something that dangerous onto a child (established trans communities in the EU even agree on that point - yikes, how bad does something have to be when even the conservatives manage to piece together a half-assed understanding that something is dangerous!?).

          But there’s so much more - trans athletes being in the same bathroom and how unfair it is that e.g. a testosterone-having person can compete on identical grounds as one lacking that. That one too is a hot topic of contention even outside of conservative circles as well.

          The surgery issue was more like “gender-affirming care offered at a school”, and iirc it was mostly a purely hypothetical, b/c since when is America known for offering HEALTHCARE, amiright!? Also, I said “forced”, but the real thing was that the child wanted it, while the parents did not, hence you know, “forced”, b/c the parents (who own the child, fully legally) did not desire it.

          The real truths, like abortion, and the economy, and literally all other facts, kinda get buried when we begin to discuss how factual matters can best be “used” for political gains.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Apparently the Dems where aware of the massive popularity Trump had. Their internal polling showed him taking 400 electoral votes. At least that’s the story being brought now. If true there never was a jaws of victory, it was all posturing by the Dems. And then it’s a shame those 71M voters still came, more should have stayed home… to signal the party top brass to go fuck themselves.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes, and the fact that Biden stepped down and endorsed Harris, nuking a democratic primary should be seen in a completely different light then.

  • Magicalus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    For fucks sake, THE VOTES ARE NOT ALL COUNTED YET. It is too early to be making graphs like this, its just misleading.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      As of right now, California is reporting about 72% of the expected total, at about 12 million votes. If the ratio is maintained, we can expect about 2.8 million more votes for Harris from California alone. And Trump can expect another 1.8 million from California.

      There are a couple hundred thousand votes to count in each of Oregon, Maryland, and DC.

    • Aermis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean most states have less than 1% of votes left to count. What change are you expecting from this graph?

      • hobovision@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Millions more votes from California, Harris and Trump will both get 40% more votes than they have now by the time counting is complete. That’s 2.9 million for Harris and 1.9 for Trump. Completely changes the graph. Harris lost something like 5-10% of Biden electorate and Trump gained a few percent of his. Still bad for Harris but doesn’t support the narrative this chart wants to be true.

        • Aermis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          40% more votes than they have now is 28 million votes each. There is definitely not 56 million more votes to count. At best there’s about a million more left to count. Over 150 million votes have already been counted. That’s just about the vast majority of votes cast

  • ComradeMiao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Here’s a chart I made of the differences:

                       2012                          2016                      2020                        2024
    

    Republican 60.9M ──────▶ 63.0M ──────▶ 74.2M ──────▶ 74.1M Democrat 65.9M ──────▶ 65.9M ──────▶ 81.2M ──────▶ 70.3M Libertarian 1.3M ──────▶ 4.5M ──────▶ 1.9M ──────▶ 0.6M Green 0.5M ──────▶ 1.5M ──────▶ 0.4M ──────▶ 0.7M (Votes in the millions)

    • Interesting Libertarian went way up the first time trump ran then back down the second time and even further the third. Does that mean they switched to trump or didn’t run? What makes a libertarian dislike trump the first time but prefer him the first and second?
    • Green also went up the first and third time trump ran. One might assume they voted biden the second but maybe harris or not vote the third?
    • Democrats went up the second time trump ran but it seems lost 10 mil the third time
    • Appears around 12 mil voters are unaccounted for or didn’t vote