Excerpt:

Prosecutors highlighted “about $10,000 — $8,000 in U.S. dollars and then $2,000 in foreign currency that was found on his person,” CNN correspondent Danny Freeman said following the court hearing.

“Also they said that he had a Faraday bag,” which blocks cell signals, a move that prosecutors alleged marked “an indication of criminal sophistication and reason they should hold him on bail,” Freeman continued.

After prosecutors made the claims, Mangione said he would like to “correct two things.”

“I don’t know where any of that money came from — I’m not sure if it was planted. And also, that bag was waterproof, so I don’t know about criminal sophistication,” the suspect said in a statement that suggested police framed him.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Our incoming president is a convicted felon and RAPIST who incited an insurrection and illegally attempted to overturn an election.

    The rule of law doesn’t mean shit anymore.

    I could give 2 fucks if this guy lies through his teeth to get off the hook. Go for it bro.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    My ez-pass transponder came with a faraday bag - clearly ez-pass is a criminal organization

    A former employer handed out branded faraday phone and wallet bags as a tchotchke- I must have worked for organized crime.

    Oh no, passport faraday bags are all over Amazon - clearly criminal and needs to be shut down

  • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    4 days ago

    A computer programmer with a common cyber security countermeasure you can buy on Amazon indicates criminal sophistication?

    Sure Jan.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    419
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Authorities are desperately trying to make an example of someone, anyone with a motive. Turns out more than half the country has one.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    From the article:

    Although a host of eyewitness accounts and video camera footage recorded Mangione’s movements before and after Thompson was killed in New York City on Wednesday, police said they were unable to locate him until a McDonald’s employee identified the suspect at a Pennsylvania franchise nearly a week later.

    They should have said “the suspect’s movements” or “the shooter’s movements”. Not “Mangione’s movements”. They are already presuming guilt by saying it was Mangione who was recorded. Newspapers used to be careful about doing this. I think they can be sued for defamation for this, can’t they?

    • SGforce@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s an American newspaper, so it’s up to the victim. Canada and EU have much stricter rules.

    • woodenskewer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      It seems kinda grey because they’re not saying he committed a crime they are saying that he was in certain camera frames and the police were looking for him. If the police announced a name then the news would be reporting fact. The camera bit could be debatable I think. If they were speaking more about the actions of the crime they’d have to alledge, which they did alledge about his “type” of bookbag.

      I could be wrong I just found your comment interesting.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah but by stating as a fact that it was Mangione who was witnessed and recorded they are stating as a fact that he is the killer, which we don’t know yet. That is-- or used to be – a big no no in reporting. But times have changed. Here is a link I found explaining how they are probably opening themselves up to a libel charge with this kind of language.

        • Manalith@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think they’re saying it definitely was Mangione who was recorded at the hotel, which if he was checking in/out is pretty easy to prove. From there they lost track of him because they didn’t know his route or he just didn’t show up on any other cameras.

          I agree that the wording is likely intentional to imply guilt, but is loose enough that they could claim that isn’t what they were doing.

  • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    279
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Also they said that he had a Faraday bag,” which blocks cell signals, a move that prosecutors alleged marked “an indication of criminal sophistication and reason they should hold him on bail,” Freeman continued.

    Prosecutors, man. Acting like he had a fucking radio jammer or something.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      194
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      There have been plenty of articles in popular media recommending Faraday bags for electronic devices. I have them for credit cards and car keys. It’s definitely not evidence of criminal intent.

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Prosecutors are another cog in the wheel of the regime. They only care for one thing is slobbing up the pole.

      I am sure this parasite thinks he is going to make a career off this prosecution.

      Disgusting

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 days ago

      Didn’t you know? Doing anything that interferes with corpos having full access to your profitable information means you’re a criminal.

  • sparrowstimulus@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sounds to me like they couldn’t catch the real shooter but they snared a doplerganger and figured they could frame him up fast based on his social media. It doesn’t make sense, his family are millionaires…the boomers might buy this crap, but anyone gen x or younger isn’t going to believe this for one minute.

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    198
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    A LOT of yesterday’s arrest is REALLY suspicious. Dude who could easily have fled the country (for a lot of reasons) and had done such a great job of covering his tracks is sitting in a mickey d’s with his murder weapon and a manifesto.

    But… a lot of his social media history (which is not impossible to fake but…) kind of suggests he was very mentally unwell. Which… uh doy? And he is mostly focused on the money (super easy to plant) and the “faraday bag”.

    As for the faraday bag? A LOT of dry bags (an internal bag you put electronics and valuables into if you are going to hike in the rain or go rafting/boating) have a metal mesh. Because they need to withstand abrasians either from being near other gear (you would be shocked how much jagged metal is in a backpack when you go on a proper alpine overnight) or just being able to survive falling overboard and bouncing on the end of a rope in rapids. And guess what a metal mesh does?

    So he presumably got a dry bag of some form to stash his personal shit in while he stashed the second backpack. And I know plenty of hikers and climbers who learn the fun way that the phone they carried “in case someone needs to get a hold of me” had zero signal the entire time it was protected from the rain.

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      157
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Where is the body camera footage?

      Until I see it, all of this shit fake news.

      Luigi didn’t do shit. They are just trying to pin it on any Italian guy that fits their narrative

      Sure he hates health insurance parasites so does 99% of US.

      It ain’t a crime!

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Considerably less than that.

            “The 1%” is, ironically, a way to protect the elites and keep us divided amongst ourselves. But that ignores the wealth inequality issues and how many people aren’t even “middle class”.

            In plenty of states? Making low six figures is already enough to put you as a “one percenter” for your demographic. Especially if you have a partner who makes a similar amount of money. And that scales with cost of living. A couple years ago (during the pandemic) I saw a really good breakdown that basically showed “if you can afford to live on your own, you are probably at least a top 5% earner”

            And those people are just as vulnerable to an illness that insurance doesn’t cover.

            No. The people benefiting aren’t even the “1%”. It is a ridiculously small percentage of the population.

            Because the population of the US is 346.3 million people. One percent of that is about 3.5 million people. You are almost guaranteed to know some “one percenters” and they are probably actually great people who are having a lot of the same struggles as you. Maybe they can afford to buy fast food but they are still only one or two bad days away from being destitute. Which tempers anger and rage and protects the people who actually have the vast majority of the wealth in this country.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              My wife and I live on my income (not amazingly but we make do in a suburban part of a lower aide of middle income state) and I’m less than half the 5% threshold for the lowest state.

        • Aermis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          You can call out news as being fake without being right wing buddo. All mainstream media owned by Sinclair is fake. Anything in between has a narrative they’re trying to achieve. If it ain’t journalism, it’s a dead opinion.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why would someone this meticulous keep the gun that’s could have been ditched? Write out a memefesto like two hours before being caught? Wear the same clothes that could’ve also been directed or burned? This feels like a patsy.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Because, as many of us pointed out, he was never some super meticulous hitman. He exhibited basic knowledge of firearms and got his stalker on like the ceo what got got was a pretty girl who asked to borrow a pencil that one time in biology class. The rest was taking a bus and wearing a face mask most of the time. It was inevitable that he would be caught unless he fled the country.

        Mostly this just highlighted how incompetent cops are. And… might be used to further efforts to just use computer vision and rudimentary “AI” to process security camera footage in the future.

        As for why he would keep his gun on him? The manifesto kind of says it all (and, to my knowledge, Luigi has not disputed THAT aspect of it). He wanted to get caught. Probably after making it clear he could have escaped if he wanted to (because getting on a flight out of the US would have been trivial).


        To be clear. If he were to have disputed the gun and manifesto I would VERY rapidly be on the side of "cops are planting shit yet again’. But the fact that he hasn’t (to my knowledge) while disputing other potentially planted or misinterpreted evidence puts the kibosh on that.

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            He did not say “the” evidence was planted. He said “that” evidence was planted. As in a subset.

            And, as I pointed out above, said evidence makes sense. The “faraday bag” is just an intentional misinterpretation. As for the foreign currency? People very much underestimate how much loose cash cops have due to civil forfeiture and it is a really easy way to argue that someone is a flight risk and should not be granted bail.

        • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 days ago

          If he wanted to be caught he could’ve turned himself in though, make it big and public if he wanted that attention.

      • twistypencil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Fall guy, planted by the mob to give the NYPD credit that they aren’t just a bunch of guys with big bellies keystone copping around, probably they have a deal with a mob boss to not bust their child exploitation ring if they have them some dude who can sit in prison

        • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          4 days ago

          His getaway sure was and dropping a bag off that had monopoly money seems more well thought out than “have gun and no change clothes”

          • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 days ago

            I still wonder if that was actual monopoly money or if they were just talking about Canadian dollars.

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            I suppose if you think running across the street, riding an e-bike for awhile, and then ditching it in a park is meticulous then we just don’t share a definition of meticulous.

    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      You know the funny thing about these “ghost guns” is they are untraceable so you don’t know where they came from. The best way to pin them to someone is to “pin” them to that person. This can be through forensics or proximity. In this case the suspect just happens to have a gun whose origins are unknown. Very convenient.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      But… a lot of his social media history (which is not impossible to fake but…) kind of suggests he was very mentally unwell.

      What are you referring to here? I’m not scouring the internet for all the information I can find but everything I’ve seen so far paints the picture of a perfectly sane person who was fed up with a broken system. I see similar sentiments all over the internet literally every day.

    • Homescool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Is there a decent thread on the facts somewhere? I am still trying to wrap my head around how they connected the subject of the shooting video to the subject of the crime stoppers picture. There are so many diffs it’s like a Mad Magazine bit.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Wait, people actually do that on accident? They aren’t just making sure their boss can’t call them?

  • index@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Looks like they are trying hard to rebrand the guy image by publishing pictures where he looks off. How i’m supposed to believe the government has no plan against the people when they pull stunt like this?

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      116
      ·
      4 days ago

      Fox news is saying people are supporting him because he’s handsome and we’re all a bunch of shallow morons.

      Completely leaving out the fact that that CEO and others like him make decisions everyday to let people suffer and/or die for profit. To buy more yachts or whatever the fuck excessively affluent people do with money. Wipe their ass with it? Use the money from dead cancer patients who hit their lifetime maximum coverage to delicately pat their hemorrhoids clean maybe?

      The media is trying so hard to spin this I hope they all get carpal tunnel from typing out all those half truths and outright lies. Then they have their claims for quality of life giving surgery denied. Then maybe they’ll get it.

      • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        4 days ago

        Fox news spent all of yesterday “just asking questions” about his connection to California to trigger more hate towards liberals where if you read the manifesto he is definitely a sovereign citizen type of person.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          I hear there is a titan(ic) moon by Saturn. Maybe they should build the world’s cheapest spaceship and go check it out. Well, I guess the starliner is available.

          • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes! And also the spacesuits are style over substance with fake ties and the cheapest polyvinyl chloride ever!

    • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Mugshots rarely look good because they want a centered and level profile of your face with a neutral expression in order to capture as much detail as possible. It also might have been a minute since he’s seen a shower or a razor. I wouldn’t call that a conspiracy, there are much more important details at play here than his looks.

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        they released multiple mugshots, pictures of him in jail and now there are even videos. That’s not normal at all.

      • irotsoma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 days ago

        Mugshots are also designed to make people look bad because it used to be a way that criminals would use for self promotion. But if they look bad then it has the opposite effect making them seem more animalistic and thus more evil. Also often used in wanted posters if enough photos are available. This has been the case for long before photography was invented with drawings as well.

        Otherwise, they’d look more like photo IDs, which have the same requirements and are bad compared to something framed specifically to flatter someone, but not as bad as mugshots. Doesn’t help that most mugshots are taken after long, abusive “interrogation” sessions or other situations that exhaust them rather than immediately upon arrest, but that’s on purpose.

        But the tactic to use mugshots as self promotional got popular when photos first came around because if they could get in a good shot, it’s not like the police could afford to take multiple. Film was expensive. And they were put in newspapers and such, so they spread around for free. Just look at the famous criminals of the Wild West era. So police doubled down on making sure the photos looked as bad as possible and it became a popular tactic to use against “famous” criminals. Now it’s used against basically all criminals.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          4 days ago

          Mugshots are also designed to make people look bad because it used to be a way that criminals would use for self promotion.

          Versus now where only presidents use them for self promotion.

      • dasenboy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Trump’s mugshot sure looked good with the practiced Hitler look that he gave. But of course he had help from the lighting guy who put on an uncommon (for mug shots) sideways light on him, thus giving an even more Hitler look to him.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Luigi needs to shut the everloving fark up and let his lawyer do the talking for him. The cops are trolling him with fake evidence and he’s falling for it.

    “The gun WASN’T a 32 caliber, it was a 22 rimfire!” etc, etc.

    • zib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      104
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is the correct answer. If you are arrested by police for ANY REASON, the only word in your vocabulary is now “lawyer”. Remember kids, anything you say or do will be used against you.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        4 days ago

        “I invoke my right to remain silent and have a lawyer.”

        It sucks, but sometimes you have to explicitly state you are exercising your rights. Just staying silent doesn’t mean they won’t stop pestering you with questions. Make it clear and concise that that you are demanding your lawyer be present and any further questioning done should be in violation of that right. But you have to make it clear you are invoking it.

        • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Glad to see this here. In many jurisdictions, if the law doesn’t say it previous rulings do: you must invoke the rights to silence and to counsel.

          It sucks but plenty of judges want to give the police every chance they can get, like those dickheads who OK’d forcing people to unlock their phones because “you already gave police your fingerprint”.

        • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not sometimes, but ALWAYS state that you are invoking your right to remain silent.

          Doesn’t matter if it’s one of the states that presumes you are invoking your right, because you might be the court case that decides otherwise this time.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 days ago

      While this is generally good advice, it doesn’t apply to public spectacle.

      There’s countless cases in the US where public pressure forced the government to drop charges or at least reduce sentences.

      This guy has support from 99% of the people. Keeping that support is important to his defense.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    It makes perfect sense for this to be a frame up because one of the incriminating items was a “Recently Used Ghost Gun”, a cheaply made 3D Printed gun that leaves no special marking on the bullet and can only really be used once. They are made to be used for crimes and discarded quickly, which is why some congressmen want to see restrictions on 3D Printers.

    This raises an interesting question: How the fuck is he dumb enough not to dispose of the gun that was meant to be disposed? And has two answers: He’s just that fucking stupid or The evidence was planted